Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
96 Imaging
34 Features
14 Overall
26
77 Imaging
51 Features
31 Overall
43
Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
- Released February 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Launched November 2009
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Overview
Let's look more closely at the Casio EX-Z35 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Casio and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the EX-Z35 (12MP) and the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) is relatively close but the EX-Z35 (1/2.3") and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) provide totally different sensor sizing.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-Z35 was released 4 months later than the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and they are both of a similar age. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-Z35 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting right into a detailed comparison, here is a simple summation of how the EX-Z35 scores versus the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z35 & Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-Z35 Gallery & Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
| EX-Z35 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Casio EX-Z35
| GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | EX-Z35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
| Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z35 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
| EX-Z35 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2010 | November 2009 | Same age | |
| Focus manually | More exact focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Absent Touch screen |
Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry your camera often, you will want to factor its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z35 provides external measurements of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") and a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has sizing of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") accompanied by a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-Z35 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you choose at that moment. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-Z35 compared to the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z35 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is 96 and 77 respectively.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its difficult to visualise the gap in sensor sizing merely by researching technical specs. The photograph here might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-Z35 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
As you can tell, the two cameras feature the identical megapixels albeit not the same sensor sizing. The EX-Z35 contains the smaller sensor which will make getting shallow DOF harder.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro |
| Class | Ultracompact | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Released | 2010-02-21 | 2009-11-10 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | GR engine III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 370.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 2848 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 200 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 50mm (1x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/2.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 10cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.5" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 180s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/3200s |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.20 m | 3.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 124 grams (0.27 lbs) | 453 grams (1.00 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 320 pictures |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-82 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $99 | $566 |