Clicky

Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12

Portability
96
Imaging
35
Features
14
Overall
26
Casio Exilim EX-Z35 front
 
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 front
Portability
84
Imaging
53
Features
39
Overall
47

Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Key Specs

Casio EX-Z35
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 3200
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
  • 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
  • Released February 2010
Ricoh GXR Mount A12
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 200 - 3200
  • 1/9000s Maximum Shutter
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • ()mm (F) lens
  • 370g - 120 x 70 x 45mm
  • Revealed August 2011
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Overview

Below, we are matching up the Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Casio and Ricoh. The image resolution of the EX-Z35 (12MP) and the GXR Mount A12 (12MP) is very similar but the EX-Z35 (1/2.3") and GXR Mount A12 (APS-C) feature totally different sensor dimensions.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The EX-Z35 was brought out 17 months prior to the GXR Mount A12 making the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-Z35 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before delving through a detailed comparison, below is a simple overview of how the EX-Z35 scores versus the GXR Mount A12 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Ricoh GXR Mount A12

 EX-Z35 GXR Mount A12 

Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR Mount A12 over the Casio EX-Z35

 GXR Mount A12 EX-Z35 
RevealedAugust 2011February 2010More recent by 17 months
Display dimension3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution920k230kCrisper display (+690k dot)

Common features in the Casio EX-Z35 and Ricoh GXR Mount A12

 EX-Z35 GXR Mount A12 
Manually focus More precise focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither offers Touch friendly display

Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Physical Comparison

When you are aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you have to consider its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z35 offers physical measurements of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") with a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Ricoh GXR Mount A12 has sizing of 120mm x 70mm x 45mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.8") having a weight of 370 grams (0.82 lbs).

Check out the Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Here is the front view over all size comparison of the EX-Z35 compared to the GXR Mount A12.

Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z35 and GXR Mount A12 is 96 and 84 respectively.

Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it is very tough to envision the gap between sensor measurements just by reviewing specs. The visual here will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-Z35 and GXR Mount A12.

All in all, the two cameras posses the exact same MP but not the same sensor measurements. The EX-Z35 includes the tinier sensor which should make getting shallow DOF trickier. The older EX-Z35 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.

Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 sensor size comparison

Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-Z35 Portrait photography info
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Portrait photography info
27
you can focus manually
no manual exposure
external flash not possible
low megapixels (12MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
55
has manual focus
sensor size is good (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
no liveview
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Casio EX-Z35 Street photography advice
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Street photography advice
48
no moving screen
lack of image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
65
sensor size is good (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
no articulating screen
does not have image stabilization
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-Z35 Sports photography features
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Sports photography features
17
no shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
39
max shutter speed is good (1/9,000 seconds)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
can't change focal length (()mm)
no liveview
slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
does not have image stabilization
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
has no phase detect auto focus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-Z35 Travel photography factors
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Travel photography factors
52
built-in flash
lack of Timelapse mode
low megapixels (12MP)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
wide angle not good (36mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
60
built-in flash
very good max aperture (f)
does not have Timelapse recording
megapixel count low (12MP)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-Z35 Landscape photography information
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Landscape photography information
28
you can focus manually
cannot change lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (36mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
small screen (2.5")
no manual exposure
lack of image stabilization
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
lack of Timelapse mode
52
has manual focus
very good max aperture (f)
decent sized screen (3 inches)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (()mm)
no liveview
does not have image stabilization
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
does not have Timelapse recording
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-Z35 Vlogging factors
Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Vlogging factors
22
wide angle not good (36mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
lack of image stabilization
low res video (640 x 480 pixels)
lack of external microphone support
26
very good max aperture (f)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pxls)
does not have external microphone port
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh GXR Mount A12 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-Z35 and Ricoh GXR Mount A12
 Casio Exilim EX-Z35Ricoh GXR Mount A12
General Information
Brand Casio Ricoh
Model type Casio Exilim EX-Z35 Ricoh GXR Mount A12
Category Ultracompact Entry-Level Mirrorless
Released 2010-02-21 2011-08-05
Body design Ultracompact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Powered by Exilim Engine 5.0 -
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.6 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 370.5mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4000 x 3000 4288 x 2848
Maximum native ISO 3200 3200
Lowest native ISO 64 200
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 36-107mm (3.0x) ()
Maximum aperture f/3.1-5.6 -
Macro focusing distance 10cm -
Crop factor 5.8 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.5" 3"
Resolution of screen 230k dot 920k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic (optional)
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4s 1s
Highest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/9000s
Continuous shooting speed - 3.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 3.20 m 9.60 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video data format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 124g (0.27 pounds) 370g (0.82 pounds)
Dimensions 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") 120 x 70 x 45mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 330 photos
Style of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID NP-82 DB-90
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) Yes (5 sec, custom)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Price at launch $99 $349