Clicky

Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

Portability
96 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
Casio Exilim EX-Z35 front
 
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC front
Portability
85 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38

Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Key Specs

Casio EX-Z35
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 3200
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
  • 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
  • Introduced February 2010
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
  • 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
  • Announced March 2010
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Overview

Its time to take a deeper look at the Casio EX-Z35 versus Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC, one being a Ultracompact and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by rivals Casio and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the EX-Z35 (12MP) and the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) is very well matched but the EX-Z35 (1/2.3") and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") offer different sensor dimensions.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The EX-Z35 was unveiled around the same time to the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and they are both of a similar generation. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z35 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before going straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief summary of how the EX-Z35 matches up against the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban 
	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

		

		

			
 EX-Z35 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC 
		

	

	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Casio EX-Z35

		

		

			
 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC EX-Z35 
Display dimensions3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution920k230kCrisper display (+690k dot)
		

	

	
	

		

		
Common features in the Casio EX-Z35 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

		

		

			
 EX-Z35 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC 
AnnouncedFebruary 2010March 2010Similar generation
Focus manually  Dial precise focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen  Absent selfie screen
Touch friendly display  Neither offers Touch friendly display
		

	

	

	
	
	
	

	

		

		
Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Physical Comparison

		

		

			
For anybody who is planning to lug around your camera frequently, you'll need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-Z35 offers physical dimensions of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") along with a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC has dimensions of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") with a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-Z35 versus Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have at that time. The following is a front view scale comparison of the EX-Z35 versus the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC size comparison
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z35 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC is 96 and 85 respectively.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC top view buttons comparison		

	

	
	

		

		
Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sensor Comparison

		

		

			
Usually, its tough to imagine the contrast between sensor measurements just by reading through a spec sheet. The photograph here will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z35 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
Clearly, both of those cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The EX-Z35 using its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field more difficult and the Casio EX-Z35 will give greater detail having an extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop pics more aggressively.
	
			Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC sensor size comparison			
		

	

	
	

		

		
Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and ViewFinder

		

		

					

		Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and Viewfinder comparison	

	
			Photography Glossary	

	
	
	
	

	

		
Photography Type Scores

		

	

	
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-Z35 Portrait photography info
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Portrait photography info
27
 has manual focus
 manual exposure not possible
 no external flash support
 low megapixels (12 megapixels)
 small sensor (1/2.3")
 lacks RAW support
36
 has manual focus
 delivers RAW files
 does not have liveview
 sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
 sensor size is small (1/1.7")
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Street Comparison
Casio EX-Z35 Street photography info
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Street photography info
48
 no articulating screen
 no image stabilization
 small sensor (1/2.3")
 lacks RAW support
65
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 delivers RAW files
 lighter than average in class (355 grams)
 fixed screen
 sensor size is small (1/1.7")
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Sports Comparison
Casio EX-Z35 Sports photography details
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sports photography details
17
 lack of shutter priority mode
 no image stabilization
 low megapixels (12MP)
 small sensor (1/2.3")
 lacks phase detect AF
25
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 does not have liveview
 max frames per second very slow (2.0 frames per second)
 sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
 sensor size is small (1/1.7")
 no phase detect autofocus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Travel Comparison
 Casio EX-Z35 as a Travel photography camera
 Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC as a Travel photography camera
52
 has built in flash
 doesn't have Timelapse mode
 low megapixels (12 megapixels)
 doesn't have a selfie friendly display
 wide angle not great (36mm)
 slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
60
 lighter than average in class (355 grams)
 has built in flash
 decently wide (24mm)
 sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
 display isn't selfie friendly
 somewhat slow max aperture (f2.5)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Landscape Comparison
 Casio EX-Z35 as a Landscape photography camera
 Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC as a Landscape photography camera
28
 has manual focus
 lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
 wide angle not great (36mm)
 slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
 screen is somewhat small (2.5 inch)
 manual exposure not possible
 no image stabilization
 low megapixels (12 megapixels)
 small sensor (1/2.3")
 lacks RAW support
 doesn't have Timelapse mode
47
 has manual focus
 decently wide (24mm)
 screen is a good size (3")
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 delivers RAW files
 cannot change lens (fixed lens mount)
 somewhat slow max aperture (f2.5)
 does not have liveview
 sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
 sensor size is small (1/1.7")
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Vlogging Comparison
 Casio EX-Z35 as a Vlogging camera
 Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC as a Vlogging camera
22
 wide angle not great (36mm)
 slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
 doesn't have a selfie friendly display
 no image stabilization
 low quality video (640 x 480 pxls)
 doesn't have microphone support
28
 decently wide (24mm)
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 lighter than average in class (355g)
 somewhat slow max aperture (f2.5)
 display isn't selfie friendly
 video res low (640 x 480 resolution)
 lack of microphone jack
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
	

		

			
Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Specifications

		

		

					

		
		

			Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-Z35 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
 Casio Exilim EX-Z35Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
General Information
Brand Name Casio Ricoh
Model Casio Exilim EX-Z35 Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
Type Ultracompact Advanced Mirrorless
Introduced 2010-02-21 2010-03-18
Body design Ultracompact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Chip Exilim Engine 5.0 Smooth Imaging Engine IV
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/1.7"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter    
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9
Max resolution 4000 x 3000 3648 x 2736
Max native ISO 3200 3200
Minimum native ISO 64 100
RAW support    
Autofocusing
Manual focus    
Autofocus touch    
Autofocus continuous    
Autofocus single    
Tracking autofocus    
Autofocus selectice    
Autofocus center weighted    
Multi area autofocus    
Live view autofocus    
Face detect focus    
Contract detect focus    
Phase detect focus    
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 36-107mm (3.0x) 24-72mm (3.0x)
Max aperture f/3.1-5.6 f/2.5-4.4
Macro focus distance 10cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 4.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 2.5 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 230k dot 920k dot
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch function    
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic (optional)
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4 secs 180 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter speed - 2.0 frames/s
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Manual exposure    
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set white balance    
Image stabilization    
Inbuilt flash    
Flash range 3.20 m 4.50 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
Hot shoe    
AEB    
WB bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment metering    
Average metering    
Spot metering    
Partial metering    
AF area metering    
Center weighted metering    
Video features
Video resolutions 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 640x480 640x480
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone input    
Headphone input    
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal    
Water proof    
Dust proof    
Shock proof    
Crush proof    
Freeze proof    
Weight 124 grams (0.27 lb) 355 grams (0.78 lb)
Physical dimensions 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 410 photographs
Style of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model NP-82 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) )
Time lapse recording    
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots One One
Price at release $99 $349