Clicky

Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh PX

Portability
96
Imaging
35
Features
14
Overall
26
Casio Exilim EX-Z35 front
 
Ricoh PX front
Portability
95
Imaging
39
Features
36
Overall
37

Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh PX Key Specs

Casio EX-Z35
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 3200
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
  • 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
  • Launched February 2010
Ricoh PX
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.9-5.4) lens
  • 156g - 100 x 55 x 21mm
  • Released August 2011
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh PX Overview

Its time to look a bit more in depth at the Casio EX-Z35 versus Ricoh PX, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Casio and Ricoh. There is a sizable difference among the resolutions of the EX-Z35 (12MP) and PX (16MP) but they possess the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The EX-Z35 was revealed 18 months earlier than the PX which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-Z35 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh PX being a Compact camera.

Before delving in to a full comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the EX-Z35 scores versus the PX with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Ricoh PX

 EX-Z35 PX 

Reasons to pick Ricoh PX over the Casio EX-Z35

 PX EX-Z35 
ReleasedAugust 2011February 2010More recent by 18 months
Screen dimension2.7"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.2")

Common features in the Casio EX-Z35 and Ricoh PX

 EX-Z35 PX 
Manually focus Dial precise focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen resolution230k230kExact same screen resolution
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen
Touch screen Absent Touch screen

Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh PX Physical Comparison

When you are intending to lug around your camera regularly, you'll need to take into account its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z35 offers outer measurements of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") having a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Ricoh PX has sizing of 100mm x 55mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") and a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs).

Examine the Casio EX-Z35 versus Ricoh PX in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are employing at that moment. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the EX-Z35 vs the PX.

Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh PX size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z35 and PX is 96 and 95 respectively.

Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh PX top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh PX Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it is very tough to imagine the difference in sensor measurements purely by checking out technical specs. The graphic here will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-Z35 and PX.

As you have seen, both of those cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different MP. You can count on the Ricoh PX to produce extra detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures much more aggressively. The older EX-Z35 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.

Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh PX sensor size comparison

Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh PX Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh PX Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-Z35 as a Portrait photography camera
Ricoh PX as a Portrait photography camera
27
manual focus
no manual mode
external flash not possible
megapixel count low (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
43
has manual focus
megapixel count good (16MP)
includes face detect focusing
external flash not possible
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Street photography with Casio EX-Z35
Street photography with Ricoh PX
48
no articulating screen
lack of image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
63
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proof
no moving screen
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-Z35 Sports photography advice
Ricoh PX Sports photography advice
17
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
44
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (16MP)
includes tracking focus
environment proof
slow frames per second (1.0 fps)
lack of shutter priority mode
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-Z35 Travel photography info
Ricoh PX Travel photography info
52
has built in flash
does not have Timelapse mode
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
wide angle not fantastic (36mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
68
environment proof
megapixel count good (16MP)
built-in flash
quite wide (28mm)
doesn't have Timelapse mode
display is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.9)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-Z35 Landscape photography highlights
Ricoh PX Landscape photography highlights
28
manual focus
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (36mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
tiny screen (2.5")
no manual mode
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
does not have Timelapse mode
47
has manual focus
quite wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
environment proof
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.9)
screen is somewhat small (2.7")
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW files
doesn't have Timelapse mode
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-Z35 Vlogging features
Ricoh PX Vlogging features
22
wide angle not fantastic (36mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
video quality not great (640 x 480 resolution)
does not have microphone socket
31
quite wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detect focusing
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.9)
display is not selfie friendly
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pxls)
doesn't have microphone port
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh PX Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-Z35 and Ricoh PX
 Casio Exilim EX-Z35Ricoh PX
General Information
Make Casio Ricoh
Model type Casio Exilim EX-Z35 Ricoh PX
Class Ultracompact Small Sensor Compact
Launched 2010-02-21 2011-08-16
Body design Ultracompact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Exilim Engine 5.0 Smooth Imaging Engine IV
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 16MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Highest Possible resolution 4000 x 3000 4608 x 3072
Maximum native ISO 3200 3200
Minimum native ISO 64 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 36-107mm (3.0x) 28-140mm (5.0x)
Maximum aperture f/3.1-5.6 f/3.9-5.4
Macro focusing range 10cm 3cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 2.5" 2.7"
Resolution of display 230 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Min shutter speed 4s 8s
Max shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter speed - 1.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 3.20 m 3.50 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video file format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 124g (0.27 lb) 156g (0.34 lb)
Dimensions 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") 100 x 55 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID NP-82 DB-100
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) Yes (2, 10 or Custom)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC card, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Retail cost $99 $329