Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh PX
96 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
95 Imaging
39 Features
36 Overall
37
Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh PX Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
- Launched February 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.4) lens
- 156g - 100 x 55 x 21mm
- Released August 2011
Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh PX Overview
Its time to look a bit more in depth at the Casio EX-Z35 versus Ricoh PX, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Casio and Ricoh. There is a sizable difference among the resolutions of the EX-Z35 (12MP) and PX (16MP) but they possess the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-Z35 was revealed 18 months earlier than the PX which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-Z35 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh PX being a Compact camera.
Before delving in to a full comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the EX-Z35 scores versus the PX with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh PX Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z35 & Ricoh PX. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z35 Gallery & Ricoh PX Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Ricoh PX
EX-Z35 | PX |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh PX over the Casio EX-Z35
PX | EX-Z35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | August 2011 | February 2010 | More recent by 18 months | |
Screen dimension | 2.7" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z35 and Ricoh PX
EX-Z35 | PX | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial precise focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Exact same screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Absent Touch screen |
Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh PX Physical Comparison
When you are intending to lug around your camera regularly, you'll need to take into account its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z35 offers outer measurements of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") having a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Ricoh PX has sizing of 100mm x 55mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") and a weight of 156 grams (0.34 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-Z35 versus Ricoh PX in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are employing at that moment. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the EX-Z35 vs the PX.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z35 and PX is 96 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh PX Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very tough to imagine the difference in sensor measurements purely by checking out technical specs. The graphic here will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-Z35 and PX.
As you have seen, both of those cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different MP. You can count on the Ricoh PX to produce extra detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures much more aggressively. The older EX-Z35 will be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh PX Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh PX Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Ricoh PX | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Ricoh |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Ricoh PX |
Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2010-02-21 | 2011-08-16 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3072 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/3.9-5.4 |
Macro focusing range | 10cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 2.5" | 2.7" |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.20 m | 3.50 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 124g (0.27 lb) | 156g (0.34 lb) |
Dimensions | 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 100 x 55 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-82 | DB-100 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $99 | $329 |