Clicky

Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh WG-20

Portability
96
Imaging
35
Features
14
Overall
26
Casio Exilim EX-Z35 front
 
Ricoh WG-20 front
Portability
93
Imaging
38
Features
36
Overall
37

Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh WG-20 Key Specs

Casio EX-Z35
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 3200
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
  • 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
  • Released February 2010
Ricoh WG-20
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 6400
  • Digital Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
  • 164g - 114 x 58 x 28mm
  • Introduced February 2014
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh WG-20 Overview

In this write-up, we will be matching up the Casio EX-Z35 and Ricoh WG-20, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Waterproof by brands Casio and Ricoh. The image resolution of the EX-Z35 (12MP) and the WG-20 (14MP) is relatively similar and they possess the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The EX-Z35 was manufactured 5 years earlier than the WG-20 and that is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-Z35 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh WG-20 being a Compact camera.

Before going in to a in depth comparison, below is a short highlight of how the EX-Z35 grades versus the WG-20 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Ricoh WG-20

 EX-Z35 WG-20 

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-20 over the Casio EX-Z35

 WG-20 EX-Z35 
IntroducedFebruary 2014February 2010Fresher by 48 months
Screen sizing2.7"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.2")

Common features in the Casio EX-Z35 and Ricoh WG-20

 EX-Z35 WG-20 
Manual focus Dial precise focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen resolution230k230kExact same screen resolution
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch screen Lack of Touch screen

Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh WG-20 Physical Comparison

When you are aiming to carry your camera, you will need to take into account its weight and size. The Casio EX-Z35 enjoys physical measurements of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-20 has specifications of 114mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 164 grams (0.36 lbs).

Look at the Casio EX-Z35 and Ricoh WG-20 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have at that moment. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the EX-Z35 and the WG-20.

Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh WG-20 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z35 and WG-20 is 96 and 93 respectively.

Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh WG-20 top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh WG-20 Sensor Comparison

Usually, its hard to see the difference between sensor sizing purely by going over technical specs. The photograph below will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-Z35 and WG-20.

As you have seen, both the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Ricoh WG-20 to offer extra detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures a little more aggressively. The older EX-Z35 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.

Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh WG-20 sensor size comparison

Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh WG-20 Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh WG-20 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-Z35 Portrait photography details
Ricoh WG-20 Portrait photography details
27
has manual focus
manual mode not available
external flash not possible
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
39
manual focus
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
offers face detect autofocus
manual exposure not available
external flash not possible
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Street photography with Casio EX-Z35
Street photography with Ricoh WG-20
48
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
62
image stabilization (Digital)
environment proof
no articulating screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Casio EX-Z35
Sports photography with Ricoh WG-20
17
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution low (12MP)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
44
image stabilization (Digital)
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
offers tracking focus
environment proof
slow continuous shooting (1.0 fps)
lack of shutter priority mode
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-Z35 Travel photography factors
Ricoh WG-20 Travel photography factors
52
flash built-in
missing Timelapse mode
sensor resolution low (12MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
wide angle not the best (36mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
71
environment proof
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
built-in flash
pretty wide (28mm)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-Z35 Landscape photography information
Ricoh WG-20 Landscape photography information
28
has manual focus
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (36mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
screen is somewhat small (2.5")
manual mode not available
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
missing Timelapse mode
47
manual focus
pretty wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Digital)
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
environment proof
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
small screen (2.7 inches)
manual exposure not available
very small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-Z35 Vlogging details
Ricoh WG-20 Vlogging details
22
wide angle not the best (36mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
screen is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
video quality not great (640 x 480 pxls)
missing external microphone socket
30
pretty wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Digital)
offers face detect autofocus
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of mic socket
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh WG-20 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-Z35 and Ricoh WG-20
 Casio Exilim EX-Z35Ricoh WG-20
General Information
Brand Name Casio Ricoh
Model Casio Exilim EX-Z35 Ricoh WG-20
Type Ultracompact Waterproof
Released 2010-02-21 2014-02-05
Physical type Ultracompact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip Exilim Engine 5.0 -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4000 x 3000 4288 x 3216
Maximum native ISO 3200 6400
Minimum native ISO 64 80
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points - 9
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 36-107mm (3.0x) 28-140mm (5.0x)
Maximal aperture f/3.1-5.6 f/3.5-5.5
Macro focus distance 10cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 2.5 inch 2.7 inch
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Screen technology - TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4s 4s
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000s 1/1500s
Continuous shooting rate - 1.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 3.20 m 4.00 m (Auto ISO)
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) 1280 x 720 (30p, 15p), 640 x 480 (30p, 15p), 320 x 240 (30p, 15p)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 124g (0.27 pounds) 164g (0.36 pounds)
Dimensions 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") 114 x 58 x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 260 photos
Form of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model NP-82 D-LI92
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal
Card slots One One
Price at launch $99 $370