Clicky

Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh WG-4

Portability
96
Imaging
35
Features
14
Overall
26
Casio Exilim EX-Z35 front
 
Ricoh WG-4 front
Portability
90
Imaging
40
Features
44
Overall
41

Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh WG-4 Key Specs

Casio EX-Z35
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 3200
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
  • 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
  • Launched February 2010
Ricoh WG-4
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
  • 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
  • Launched February 2014
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh WG-4 Overview

Here, we will be reviewing the Casio EX-Z35 versus Ricoh WG-4, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Waterproof by brands Casio and Ricoh. There is a huge difference between the resolutions of the EX-Z35 (12MP) and WG-4 (16MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The EX-Z35 was introduced 5 years earlier than the WG-4 and that is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-Z35 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh WG-4 being a Compact camera.

Before delving into a in depth comparison, here is a quick summary of how the EX-Z35 scores against the WG-4 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

        

Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Ricoh WG-4

 EX-Z35 WG-4 

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Casio EX-Z35

 WG-4 EX-Z35 
LaunchedFebruary 2014February 2010More recent by 48 months
Screen size3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution460k230kCrisper screen (+230k dot)

Common features in the Casio EX-Z35 and Ricoh WG-4

 EX-Z35 WG-4 
Manual focus More exact focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Absent Touch friendly screen

Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh WG-4 Physical Comparison

In case you're aiming to lug around your camera often, you're going to have to factor in its weight and size. The Casio EX-Z35 features external dimensions of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") and a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-4 has specifications of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).

See the Casio EX-Z35 versus Ricoh WG-4 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you select at the time. The following is a front view over all size comparison of the EX-Z35 vs the WG-4.

Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh WG-4 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z35 and WG-4 is 96 and 90 respectively.

Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh WG-4 top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh WG-4 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it can be hard to visualize the contrast between sensor measurements only by looking at a spec sheet. The visual below will give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z35 and WG-4.

As you can see, both cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different megapixels. You should expect the Ricoh WG-4 to give greater detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The older EX-Z35 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.

Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh WG-4 sensor size comparison

Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Casio EX-Z35
Portrait photography with Ricoh WG-4
27
you can focus manually
no manual control
no external flash support
MP count low (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
41
focusing manually
good megapixels (16MP)
features face detection focusing
no manual control
cannot use external flash
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Casio EX-Z35 Street photography details
Ricoh WG-4 Street photography details
48
no moving screen
no image stabilization
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
61
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather sealing
no articulating screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-Z35 Sports photography factors
Ricoh WG-4 Sports photography factors
17
lack of shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
MP count low (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
45
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
features tracking autofocus
weather sealing
low fps (2.0 frames per second)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
terrible battery (240 CIPA)
has no phase detect AF
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-Z35 as a Travel photography camera
Ricoh WG-4 as a Travel photography camera
52
built-in flash
does not have Time Lapse mode
MP count low (12 megapixels)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
wide angle not great (36mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
72
weather sealing
good megapixels (16MP)
built-in flash
relatively wide (25mm)
fast maximum aperture (f2.0)
terrible battery (240 per charge)
display isn't selfie friendly
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-Z35 as a Landscape photography camera
Ricoh WG-4 as a Landscape photography camera
28
you can focus manually
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (36mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
screen is somewhat small (2.5")
no manual control
no image stabilization
MP count low (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
does not have Time Lapse mode
54
focusing manually
relatively wide (25mm)
fast maximum aperture (f2.0)
nice screen size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good megapixels (16MP)
weather sealing
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
no manual control
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
terrible battery (240 shots)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Casio EX-Z35
Vlogging with Ricoh WG-4
22
wide angle not great (36mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
no image stabilization
video resolution low (640 x 480 pxls)
does not have external mic socket
36
relatively wide (25mm)
fast maximum aperture (f2.0)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detection focusing
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
display isn't selfie friendly
missing external microphone socket
Photography Glossary

Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh WG-4 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-Z35 and Ricoh WG-4
 Casio Exilim EX-Z35Ricoh WG-4
General Information
Brand Name Casio Ricoh
Model Casio Exilim EX-Z35 Ricoh WG-4
Type Ultracompact Waterproof
Launched 2010-02-21 2014-02-05
Physical type Ultracompact Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by Exilim Engine 5.0 -
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4000 x 3000 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 3200 6400
Lowest native ISO 64 125
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Number of focus points - 9
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 36-107mm (3.0x) 25-100mm (4.0x)
Largest aperture f/3.1-5.6 f/2.0-4.9
Macro focus range 10cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 2.5 inches 3 inches
Display resolution 230k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Display tech - TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4s 4s
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000s 1/4000s
Continuous shooting rate - 2.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 3.20 m 10.00 m (Auto ISO)
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p)
Highest video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video file format Motion JPEG H.264
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 124g (0.27 lb) 230g (0.51 lb)
Physical dimensions 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 240 photos
Battery type - Battery Pack
Battery model NP-82 D-LI92
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal
Card slots 1 1
Retail pricing $99 $330