Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS
96 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
- Launched February 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 236g - 125 x 65 x 32mm
- Introduced February 2015
- Succeeded the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
- Updated by Ricoh WG-6
Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Overview
Lets look a bit more in depth at the Casio EX-Z35 and Ricoh WG-5 GPS, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Casio and Ricoh. There is a significant difference among the resolutions of the EX-Z35 (12MP) and WG-5 GPS (16MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe EX-Z35 was revealed 6 years earlier than the WG-5 GPS and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-Z35 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh WG-5 GPS being a Compact camera.
Before delving right into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the EX-Z35 scores against the WG-5 GPS with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z35 and Ricoh WG-5 GPS. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z35 Gallery and Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
EX-Z35 | WG-5 GPS |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-5 GPS over the Casio EX-Z35
WG-5 GPS | EX-Z35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2015 | February 2010 | More recent by 60 months | |
Screen size | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z35 and Ricoh WG-5 GPS
EX-Z35 | WG-5 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial exact focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | No Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you need to consider its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-Z35 has exterior measurements of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") and a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-5 GPS has measurements of 125mm x 65mm x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 236 grams (0.52 lbs).
See the Casio EX-Z35 and Ricoh WG-5 GPS in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are employing at that time. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the EX-Z35 vs the WG-5 GPS.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z35 and WG-5 GPS is 96 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Sensor Comparison
Usually, its tough to visualise the gap in sensor measurements merely by seeing a spec sheet. The graphic here should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z35 and WG-5 GPS.
As you can see, both of the cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same resolution. You should count on the Ricoh WG-5 GPS to show greater detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs way more aggressively. The older EX-Z35 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Ricoh WG-5 GPS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Ricoh |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Ricoh WG-5 GPS |
Type | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
Launched | 2010-02-21 | 2015-02-10 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 125 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 10cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 14.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.20 m | 10.40 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 124 grams (0.27 lb) | 236 grams (0.52 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 125 x 65 x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 240 photos |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-82 | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $99 | $500 |