Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh WG-50
96 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh WG-50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
- Released February 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Announced May 2017
Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh WG-50 Overview
Following is a comprehensive review of the Casio EX-Z35 and Ricoh WG-50, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Waterproof by competitors Casio and Ricoh. There is a substantial difference among the sensor resolutions of the EX-Z35 (12MP) and WG-50 (16MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-Z35 was introduced 8 years before the WG-50 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z35 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh WG-50 being a Compact camera.
Before going straight to a thorough comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the EX-Z35 grades vs the WG-50 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh WG-50 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z35 & Ricoh WG-50. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z35 Gallery & Ricoh WG-50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Ricoh WG-50
EX-Z35 | WG-50 |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Casio EX-Z35
WG-50 | EX-Z35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | May 2017 | February 2010 | More modern by 88 months | |
Screen dimensions | 2.7" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z35 and Ricoh WG-50
EX-Z35 | WG-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial exact focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Exact same screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Lacking Touch screen |
Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh WG-50 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry around your camera regularly, you should think about its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-Z35 features exterior dimensions of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") and a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-50 has measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-Z35 and Ricoh WG-50 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you select at that time. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-Z35 vs the WG-50.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z35 and WG-50 is 96 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh WG-50 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's tough to imagine the difference in sensor sizes simply by looking through technical specs. The image here might provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z35 and WG-50.
As you can tell, both of those cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Ricoh WG-50 to provide you with greater detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z35 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh WG-50 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh WG-50 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Ricoh WG-50 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Ricoh |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Ricoh WG-50 |
Class | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
Released | 2010-02-21 | 2017-05-24 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 125 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus range | 10cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.5" | 2.7" |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 8.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.20 m | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | On, off |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Yes (Wireless) |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 124 grams (0.27 lbs) | 193 grams (0.43 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 images |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-82 | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $99 | $280 |