Clicky

Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh WG-50

Portability
96
Imaging
35
Features
14
Overall
26
Casio Exilim EX-Z35 front
 
Ricoh WG-50 front
Portability
91
Imaging
42
Features
39
Overall
40

Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh WG-50 Key Specs

Casio EX-Z35
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 3200
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
  • 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
  • Released February 2010
Ricoh WG-50
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Digital Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
  • 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
  • Announced May 2017
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh WG-50 Overview

Following is a comprehensive review of the Casio EX-Z35 and Ricoh WG-50, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Waterproof by competitors Casio and Ricoh. There is a substantial difference among the sensor resolutions of the EX-Z35 (12MP) and WG-50 (16MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor size (1/2.3").

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The EX-Z35 was introduced 8 years before the WG-50 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z35 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh WG-50 being a Compact camera.

Before going straight to a thorough comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the EX-Z35 grades vs the WG-50 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Ricoh WG-50

 EX-Z35 WG-50 

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Casio EX-Z35

 WG-50 EX-Z35 
AnnouncedMay 2017February 2010More modern by 88 months
Screen dimensions2.7"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.2")

Common features in the Casio EX-Z35 and Ricoh WG-50

 EX-Z35 WG-50 
Manual focus Dial exact focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen resolution230k230kExact same screen resolution
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch screen Lacking Touch screen

Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh WG-50 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is intending to carry around your camera regularly, you should think about its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-Z35 features exterior dimensions of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") and a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-50 has measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).

Analyze the Casio EX-Z35 and Ricoh WG-50 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you select at that time. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-Z35 vs the WG-50.

Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh WG-50 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z35 and WG-50 is 96 and 91 respectively.

Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh WG-50 top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh WG-50 Sensor Comparison

Often, it's tough to imagine the difference in sensor sizes simply by looking through technical specs. The image here might provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z35 and WG-50.

As you can tell, both of those cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Ricoh WG-50 to provide you with greater detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z35 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.

Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh WG-50 sensor size comparison

Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh WG-50 Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh WG-50 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Casio EX-Z35
Portrait photography with Ricoh WG-50
27
has manual focus
lack of manual exposure
cannot use external flash
low MP (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
42
manual focus
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
comes with face detect autofocus
manual mode not possible
cannot use external flash
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Casio EX-Z35 Street photography details
Ricoh WG-50 Street photography details
48
no moving screen
does not have image stabilization
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
62
image stabilization (Digital)
weather proof
no moving screen
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-Z35 Sports photography advice
Ricoh WG-50 Sports photography advice
17
no shutter priority
does not have image stabilization
low MP (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
49
image stabilization (Digital)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
comes with tracking focus
weather proof
no shutter priority
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Casio EX-Z35
Travel photography with Ricoh WG-50
52
built-in flash
no Time Lapse mode
low MP (12MP)
display is not selfie friendly
wide angle not fantastic (36mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
71
weather proof
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (28mm)
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Casio EX-Z35
Landscape photography with Ricoh WG-50
28
has manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (36mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
screen is somewhat small (2.5")
lack of manual exposure
does not have image stabilization
low MP (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
no Time Lapse mode
48
manual focus
reasonably wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Digital)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
weather proof
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
small screen (2.7 inches)
manual mode not possible
very small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-Z35 Vlogging info
Ricoh WG-50 Vlogging info
22
wide angle not fantastic (36mm)
slow maximum aperture (f3.1)
display is not selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
video quality not great (640 x 480 pixels)
no mic socket
33
reasonably wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Digital)
comes with face detect autofocus
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen isn't selfie friendly
lack of microphone socket
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh WG-50 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-Z35 and Ricoh WG-50
 Casio Exilim EX-Z35Ricoh WG-50
General Information
Make Casio Ricoh
Model Casio Exilim EX-Z35 Ricoh WG-50
Class Ultracompact Waterproof
Released 2010-02-21 2017-05-24
Physical type Ultracompact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip Exilim Engine 5.0 -
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4000 x 3000 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 3200 6400
Min native ISO 64 125
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Number of focus points - 9
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 36-107mm (3.0x) 28-140mm (5.0x)
Maximal aperture f/3.1-5.6 f/3.5-5.5
Macro focus range 10cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.5" 2.7"
Resolution of screen 230k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Min shutter speed 4 seconds 4 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate - 8.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 3.20 m 5.50 m (at Auto ISO)
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft On, off
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Yes (Wireless)
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 124 grams (0.27 lbs) 193 grams (0.43 lbs)
Physical dimensions 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 300 images
Battery type - Battery Pack
Battery model NP-82 D-LI92
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC card
Card slots Single Single
Pricing at release $99 $280