Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh WG-50
96 Imaging
34 Features
14 Overall
26
91 Imaging
41 Features
39 Overall
40
Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh WG-50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
- Released February 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Announced May 2017
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh WG-50 Overview
Following is a comprehensive review of the Casio EX-Z35 and Ricoh WG-50, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Waterproof by competitors Casio and Ricoh. There is a substantial difference among the sensor resolutions of the EX-Z35 (12MP) and WG-50 (16MP) but both cameras boast the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-Z35 was introduced 8 years before the WG-50 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z35 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh WG-50 being a Compact camera.
Before going straight to a thorough comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the EX-Z35 grades vs the WG-50 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh WG-50 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z35 & Ricoh WG-50. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z35 Gallery & Ricoh WG-50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Ricoh WG-50
| EX-Z35 | WG-50 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Casio EX-Z35
| WG-50 | EX-Z35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | May 2017 | February 2010 | More modern by 88 months | |
| Screen dimensions | 2.7" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z35 and Ricoh WG-50
| EX-Z35 | WG-50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Dial exact focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Exact same screen resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Lacking Touch screen |
Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh WG-50 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry around your camera regularly, you should think about its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-Z35 features exterior dimensions of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") and a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-50 has measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-Z35 and Ricoh WG-50 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you select at that time. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-Z35 vs the WG-50.

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z35 and WG-50 is 96 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh WG-50 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's tough to imagine the difference in sensor sizes simply by looking through technical specs. The image here might provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z35 and WG-50.
As you can tell, both of those cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Ricoh WG-50 to provide you with greater detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z35 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh WG-50 Screen and ViewFinder
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh WG-50 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Ricoh WG-50 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Ricoh WG-50 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2010-02-21 | 2017-05-24 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus range | 10cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.5" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 8.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.20 m | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | On, off |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Yes (Wireless) |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 124 grams (0.27 lbs) | 193 grams (0.43 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 images |
| Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-82 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $99 | $280 |