Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh WG-70
96 Imaging
34 Features
14 Overall
26
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh WG-70 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
- Revealed February 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Launched February 2020
- Newer Model is Ricoh WG-80
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh WG-70 Overview
Here, we will be reviewing the Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh WG-70, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Waterproof by competitors Casio and Ricoh. There is a noticeable difference among the resolutions of the EX-Z35 (12MP) and WG-70 (16MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-Z35 was manufactured 11 years before the WG-70 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-Z35 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh WG-70 being a Compact camera.
Before delving right into a more detailed comparison, here is a quick summation of how the EX-Z35 grades vs the WG-70 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh WG-70 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z35 & Ricoh WG-70. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z35 Gallery & Ricoh WG-70 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Ricoh WG-70
| EX-Z35 | WG-70 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-70 over the Casio EX-Z35
| WG-70 | EX-Z35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2020 |  | February 2010 | More modern by 121 months |
| Screen size | 2.7" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z35 and Ricoh WG-70
| EX-Z35 | WG-70 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Identical screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh WG-70 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry around your camera, you will need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-Z35 provides external measurements of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") with a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-70 has measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh WG-70 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are using at the time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-Z35 and the WG-70.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z35 and WG-70 is 96 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh WG-70 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it can be tough to picture the gap in sensor sizes only by checking out a spec sheet. The pic underneath may give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z35 and WG-70.
Clearly, both of the cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different resolution. You can count on the Ricoh WG-70 to provide extra detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs way more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z35 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh WG-70 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Casio EX-Z35 vs Ricoh WG-70 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Ricoh WG-70 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Ricoh WG-70 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2010-02-21 | 2020-02-04 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 125 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 10cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.5 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.20 m | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | On, off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Yes (Wireless) |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 124 gr (0.27 lb) | 193 gr (0.43 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 photos |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-82 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $99 | $280 |