Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung DV150F
96 Imaging
34 Features
14 Overall
26
96 Imaging
39 Features
29 Overall
35
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung DV150F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
- Released February 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-125mm (F2.5-6.3) lens
- 116g - 96 x 55 x 18mm
- Released January 2013
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung DV150F Overview
On this page, we will be looking at the Casio EX-Z35 and Samsung DV150F, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. There is a sizable difference between the resolutions of the EX-Z35 (12MP) and DV150F (16MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-Z35 was revealed 3 years prior to the DV150F which is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z35 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung DV150F being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the EX-Z35 matches up versus the DV150F in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung DV150F Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z35 & Samsung DV150F. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z35 Gallery & Samsung DV150F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Samsung DV150F
| EX-Z35 | DV150F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very precise focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung DV150F over the Casio EX-Z35
| DV150F | EX-Z35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2013 |  | February 2010 | Newer by 35 months |
| Screen dimensions | 2.7" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z35 and Samsung DV150F
| EX-Z35 | DV150F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen |
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung DV150F Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to travel with your camera often, you are going to need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-Z35 has got outside measurements of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") with a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Samsung DV150F has dimensions of 96mm x 55mm x 18mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-Z35 and Samsung DV150F in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have attached at that time. Here is a front view size comparison of the EX-Z35 against the DV150F.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z35 and DV150F is 96 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung DV150F Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its difficult to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions just by reading specifications. The pic here should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z35 and DV150F.
Plainly, both the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different resolution. You can count on the Samsung DV150F to offer you more detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z35 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung DV150F Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung DV150F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Samsung DV150F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Samsung DV150F |
| Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2010-02-21 | 2013-01-07 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/2.5-6.3 |
| Macro focusing distance | 10cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.5 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | - | Rear TFT LCD + 1.5 inch front LCd |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.20 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 124 grams (0.27 lb) | 116 grams (0.26 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 96 x 55 x 18mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-82 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $99 | $150 |