Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung EX2F
96 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
90 Imaging
37 Features
62 Overall
47
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung EX2F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
- Revealed February 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-80mm (F1.4-2.7) lens
- 294g - 112 x 62 x 29mm
- Announced December 2012
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung EX2F Overview
Here is a thorough overview of the Casio EX-Z35 versus Samsung EX2F, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-Z35 (12MP) and the EX2F (12MP) is relatively similar but the EX-Z35 (1/2.3") and EX2F (1/1.7") possess totally different sensor dimensions.
Peek Behind the Lens of 'Photographer' and Their Go-To CamerasThe EX-Z35 was unveiled 3 years before the EX2F and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-Z35 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung EX2F being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight into a full comparison, below is a simple overview of how the EX-Z35 matches up versus the EX2F when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung EX2F Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z35 & Samsung EX2F. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z35 Gallery & Samsung EX2F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Samsung EX2F
EX-Z35 | EX2F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 230k | 0k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung EX2F over the Casio EX-Z35
EX2F | EX-Z35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | December 2012 | February 2010 | Fresher by 34 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z35 and Samsung EX2F
EX-Z35 | EX2F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very precise focus | |||
Touch screen | Neither includes Touch screen |
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung EX2F Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry your camera often, you will have to take into account its weight and size. The Casio EX-Z35 features outside measurements of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") with a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Samsung EX2F has specifications of 112mm x 62mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 294 grams (0.65 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-Z35 versus Samsung EX2F in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you use at that moment. Here is the front view over all size comparison of the EX-Z35 compared to the EX2F.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z35 and EX2F is 96 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung EX2F Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor sizing purely by reviewing specifications. The visual underneath may give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-Z35 and EX2F.
Plainly, each of the cameras posses the exact same megapixel count albeit not the same sensor sizing. The EX-Z35 offers the tinier sensor which will make getting shallow DOF more challenging. The older EX-Z35 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung EX2F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung EX2F Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Samsung EX2F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Samsung EX2F |
Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2010-02-21 | 2012-12-18 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 24-80mm (3.3x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/1.4-2.7 |
Macro focus distance | 10cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen sizing | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 0 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | - | AMOLED |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | - |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.20 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 124 gr (0.27 lbs) | 294 gr (0.65 lbs) |
Dimensions | 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 112 x 62 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 48 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.0 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.5 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 209 |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-82 | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $99 | $478 |