Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung GX-10
96 Imaging
34 Features
14 Overall
26
59 Imaging
48 Features
43 Overall
46
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung GX-10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
- Released February 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 793g - 142 x 101 x 70mm
- Revealed September 2006
- Refreshed by Samsung GX-20
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung GX-10 Overview
On this page, we will be contrasting the Casio EX-Z35 and Samsung GX-10, one is a Ultracompact and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-Z35 (12MP) and the GX-10 (10MP) is relatively similar but the EX-Z35 (1/2.3") and GX-10 (APS-C) posses totally different sensor sizes.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-Z35 was announced 3 years after the GX-10 which is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z35 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung GX-10 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before diving right into a thorough comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the EX-Z35 scores versus the GX-10 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung GX-10 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z35 and Samsung GX-10. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-Z35 Gallery and Samsung GX-10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Samsung GX-10
| EX-Z35 | GX-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2010 | September 2006 | More modern by 42 months | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 210k | Clearer screen (+20k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-10 over the Casio EX-Z35
| GX-10 | EX-Z35 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-Z35 and Samsung GX-10
| EX-Z35 | GX-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial exact focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 2.5" | 2.5" | Equal screen dimensions | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung GX-10 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry around your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor in its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z35 provides outer measurements of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") with a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Samsung GX-10 has sizing of 142mm x 101mm x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") with a weight of 793 grams (1.75 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-Z35 and Samsung GX-10 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have attached during that time. Below is a front view size comparison of the EX-Z35 compared to the GX-10.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z35 and GX-10 is 96 and 59 respectively.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung GX-10 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be hard to envision the gap between sensor sizes only by reading specs. The pic here will offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z35 and GX-10.
All in all, both of these cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The EX-Z35 using its tinier sensor will make shooting shallower DOF trickier and the Casio EX-Z35 will offer extra detail with its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The more modern EX-Z35 is going to have an advantage in sensor tech.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung GX-10 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung GX-10 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Samsung GX-10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Samsung GX-10 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Advanced DSLR |
| Released | 2010-02-21 | 2006-09-21 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3872 x 2592 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 11 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 |
| Lens zoom range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | - |
| Max aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 10cm | - |
| Number of lenses | - | 151 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.5 inches | 2.5 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 210 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 3.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.20 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/180 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | - |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | None |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 124g (0.27 pounds) | 793g (1.75 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 142 x 101 x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-82 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $99 | $850 |