Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung HZ15W
96 Imaging
34 Features
14 Overall
26
90 Imaging
34 Features
31 Overall
32
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung HZ15W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
- Launched February 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-240mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 249g - 105 x 61 x 37mm
- Introduced February 2009
- Alternate Name is WB550
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung HZ15W Overview
The following is a complete review of the Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung HZ15W, one is a Ultracompact and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-Z35 (12MP) and the HZ15W (12MP) is relatively close and both cameras provide the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe EX-Z35 was released 13 months after the HZ15W which makes them a generation away from one another. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z35 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung HZ15W being a Compact camera.
Before we go right into a full comparison, here is a simple summary of how the EX-Z35 grades versus the HZ15W in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung HZ15W Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z35 and Samsung HZ15W. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-Z35 Gallery and Samsung HZ15W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Samsung HZ15W
| EX-Z35 | HZ15W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2010 | February 2009 | Newer by 13 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ15W over the Casio EX-Z35
| HZ15W | EX-Z35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z35 and Samsung HZ15W
| EX-Z35 | HZ15W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More precise focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung HZ15W Physical Comparison
When you are looking to travel with your camera frequently, you will have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-Z35 features external dimensions of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) while the Samsung HZ15W has dimensions of 105mm x 61mm x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") along with a weight of 249 grams (0.55 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung HZ15W in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at that time. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the EX-Z35 and the HZ15W.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z35 and HZ15W is 96 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung HZ15W Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very difficult to imagine the difference in sensor dimensions purely by looking through specs. The pic here should offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z35 and HZ15W.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the same MP therefore you should expect comparable quality of images though you should really factor the production date of the cameras into account. The more recent EX-Z35 should have a benefit in sensor tech.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung HZ15W Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung HZ15W Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Samsung HZ15W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Samsung HZ15W |
| Also referred to as | - | WB550 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2010-02-21 | 2009-02-23 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 24-240mm (10.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/3.3-5.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 10cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.5" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 16s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.20 m | 4.70 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 124 gr (0.27 lbs) | 249 gr (0.55 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 105 x 61 x 37mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-82 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $99 | $330 |