Clicky

Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung NX200

Portability
96
Imaging
35
Features
14
Overall
26
Casio Exilim EX-Z35 front
 
Samsung NX200 front
Portability
90
Imaging
61
Features
57
Overall
59

Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung NX200 Key Specs

Casio EX-Z35
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 3200
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
  • 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
  • Announced February 2010
Samsung NX200
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 12800
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Samsung NX Mount
  • 223g - 117 x 63 x 36mm
  • Announced February 2012
  • Succeeded the Samsung NX100
  • Later Model is Samsung NX210
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung NX200 Overview

Here is a in-depth analysis of the Casio EX-Z35 versus Samsung NX200, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Casio and Samsung. There exists a sizable gap between the sensor resolutions of the EX-Z35 (12MP) and NX200 (20MP) and the EX-Z35 (1/2.3") and NX200 (APS-C) posses totally different sensor measurements.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The EX-Z35 was brought out 24 months earlier than the NX200 making them a generation apart from one another. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-Z35 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung NX200 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before we go into a detailed comparison, here is a brief view of how the EX-Z35 grades versus the NX200 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Samsung NX200

 EX-Z35 NX200 

Reasons to pick Samsung NX200 over the Casio EX-Z35

 NX200 EX-Z35 
AnnouncedFebruary 2012February 2010Fresher by 24 months
Display size3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution614k230kClearer display (+384k dot)

Common features in the Casio EX-Z35 and Samsung NX200

 EX-Z35 NX200 
Manually focus Dial exact focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither offers Touch friendly display

Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung NX200 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is going to carry your camera, you're going to have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-Z35 offers outer dimensions of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") with a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Samsung NX200 has dimensions of 117mm x 63mm x 36mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4") and a weight of 223 grams (0.49 lbs).

Take a look at the Casio EX-Z35 versus Samsung NX200 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have attached at the time. Here is a front view measurements comparison of the EX-Z35 and the NX200.

Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung NX200 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z35 and NX200 is 96 and 90 respectively.

Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung NX200 top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung NX200 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it can be tough to visualise the gap between sensor sizing simply by looking at specs. The graphic underneath should offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z35 and NX200.

As you can plainly see, both of these cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The EX-Z35 due to its tinier sensor will make getting shallower depth of field tougher and the Samsung NX200 will resolve greater detail having its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images way more aggressively. The older EX-Z35 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.

Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung NX200 sensor size comparison

Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung NX200 Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung NX200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-Z35 Portrait photography factors
Samsung NX200 Portrait photography factors
27
has manual focus
lack of manual exposure
external flash not possible
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
76
you can focus manually
good resolution (20 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
comes with face detect focusing
exports RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Street photography with Casio EX-Z35
Street photography with Samsung NX200
48
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
73
sensor size is good (APS-C)
exports RAW files
lighter than competitors (223g)
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-Z35 Sports photography details
Samsung NX200 Sports photography details
17
no shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
sensor resolution low (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
55
good resolution (20MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
no image stabilization
has no phase detect AF
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-Z35 Travel photography information
Samsung NX200 Travel photography information
52
built-in flash
does not have Time Lapse mode
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
wide angle not fantastic (36mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
68
lighter than competitors (223g)
good resolution (20 megapixels)
lack of Time Lapse recording
display isn't selfie friendly
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-Z35 Landscape photography details
Samsung NX200 Landscape photography details
28
has manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (36mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
screen is somewhat small (2.5 inch)
lack of manual exposure
no image stabilization
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
does not have Time Lapse mode
70
you can focus manually
switch lenses (Samsung NX mount)
screen size is good (3 inches)
good resolution (20MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
exports RAW files
no image stabilization
lack of Time Lapse recording
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-Z35 Vlogging highlights
Samsung NX200 Vlogging highlights
22
wide angle not fantastic (36mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
screen is not selfie friendly
no image stabilization
video quality not great (640 x 480 pixels)
does not have external mic jack
34
comes with face detect focusing
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competitors (223g)
display isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
lack of mic jack
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung NX200 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-Z35 and Samsung NX200
 Casio Exilim EX-Z35Samsung NX200
General Information
Company Casio Samsung
Model Casio Exilim EX-Z35 Samsung NX200
Class Ultracompact Entry-Level Mirrorless
Announced 2010-02-21 2012-02-28
Body design Ultracompact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Chip Exilim Engine 5.0 -
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 20MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 4000 x 3000 5472 x 3648
Max native ISO 3200 12800
Minimum native ISO 64 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Number of focus points - 15
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens Samsung NX
Lens focal range 36-107mm (3.0x) -
Highest aperture f/3.1-5.6 -
Macro focus range 10cm -
Total lenses - 32
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1.5
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 2.5 inches 3 inches
Resolution of display 230k dot 614k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Display technology - Active Matrix OLED screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic (optional)
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4 secs 30 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shooting speed - 7.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 3.20 m no built-in flash
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Highest flash sync - 1/180 secs
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None Optional
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 124g (0.27 pounds) 223g (0.49 pounds)
Physical dimensions 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") 117 x 63 x 36mm (4.6" x 2.5" x 1.4")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested 69
DXO Color Depth score not tested 22.6
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 12.6
DXO Low light score not tested 618
Other
Battery life - 330 shots
Battery format - Battery Pack
Battery model NP-82 BC1030
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) Yes (2 sec to 30 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage media SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots Single Single
Pricing at launch $99 $818