Clicky

Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung NX300M

Portability
96
Imaging
35
Features
14
Overall
26
Casio Exilim EX-Z35 front
 
Samsung NX300M front
Portability
86
Imaging
62
Features
73
Overall
66

Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung NX300M Key Specs

Casio EX-Z35
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 3200
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
  • 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
  • Announced February 2010
Samsung NX300M
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3.3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Samsung NX Mount
  • 331g - 122 x 64 x 41mm
  • Announced January 2013
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung NX300M Overview

Below is a in depth overview of the Casio EX-Z35 and Samsung NX300M, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Casio and Samsung. There is a large difference between the resolutions of the EX-Z35 (12MP) and NX300M (20MP) and the EX-Z35 (1/2.3") and NX300M (APS-C) use totally different sensor sizing.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The EX-Z35 was brought out 3 years earlier than the NX300M and that is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-Z35 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung NX300M being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before diving straight into a complete comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the EX-Z35 grades versus the NX300M with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

        

Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Samsung NX300M

 EX-Z35 NX300M 

Reasons to pick Samsung NX300M over the Casio EX-Z35

 NX300M EX-Z35 
AnnouncedJanuary 2013February 2010More recent by 34 months
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen sizing3.3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.8")
Screen resolution768k230kClearer screen (+538k dot)
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Casio EX-Z35 and Samsung NX300M

 EX-Z35 NX300M 
Manually focus Dial precise focusing
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen

Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung NX300M Physical Comparison

When you are looking to lug around your camera, you will need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-Z35 comes with external dimensions of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") along with a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Samsung NX300M has measurements of 122mm x 64mm x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") along with a weight of 331 grams (0.73 lbs).

Compare the Casio EX-Z35 and Samsung NX300M in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the EX-Z35 compared to the NX300M.

Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung NX300M size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z35 and NX300M is 96 and 86 respectively.

Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung NX300M top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung NX300M Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it is hard to visualise the difference between sensor measurements merely by reading through technical specs. The photograph here will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z35 and NX300M.

As you can tell, both of the cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The EX-Z35 featuring a tinier sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field trickier and the Samsung NX300M will resolve more detail having its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots a little more aggressively. The older EX-Z35 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.

Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung NX300M sensor size comparison

Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung NX300M Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung NX300M Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Casio EX-Z35
Portrait photography with Samsung NX300M
27
you can focus manually
lack of manual mode
external flash not possible
low MP (12 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
77
has manual focus
good MP (20MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
comes with face detection focus
supports RAW formats
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Casio EX-Z35 as a Street photography camera
Samsung NX300M as a Street photography camera
48
no moving screen
does not have image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
80
has a tilting screen
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
provides touch focus
good ISO range (25,600)
lack of image stabilization
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-Z35 Sports photography info
Samsung NX300M Sports photography info
17
no shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
low MP (12 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
72
max shutter speed is good (1/6,000 seconds)
good MP (20MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
comes with tracking autofocus
comes with phase detect auto focus
lack of image stabilization
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-Z35 Travel photography details
Samsung NX300M Travel photography details
52
flash built-in
missing Time Lapse function
low MP (12 megapixels)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
wide angle not good (36mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
66
provides touch focus
good MP (20MP)
no Timelapse mode
does not contain selfie friendly display
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-Z35 as a Landscape photography camera
Samsung NX300M as a Landscape photography camera
28
you can focus manually
cannot change lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (36mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
small screen (2.5 inches)
lack of manual mode
does not have image stabilization
low MP (12MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
missing Time Lapse function
72
has manual focus
switch lenses (Samsung NX mount)
screen size is good (3.3 inch)
good MP (20MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
good ISO range (25,600)
supports RAW formats
lack of image stabilization
no Timelapse mode
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-Z35 as a Vlogging camera
Samsung NX300M as a Vlogging camera
22
wide angle not good (36mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
doesn't posses selfie friendly display
does not have image stabilization
low res video (640 x 480 pixels)
missing external mic socket
33
touch screen
comes with face detection focus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
does not contain selfie friendly display
lack of image stabilization
no external microphone jack
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung NX300M Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-Z35 and Samsung NX300M
 Casio Exilim EX-Z35Samsung NX300M
General Information
Make Casio Samsung
Model type Casio Exilim EX-Z35 Samsung NX300M
Type Ultracompact Entry-Level Mirrorless
Announced 2010-02-21 2013-01-03
Body design Ultracompact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Powered by Exilim Engine 5.0 DRIMe IV
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 20MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 4000 x 3000 5472 x 3648
Max native ISO 3200 25600
Min native ISO 64 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points - 247
Lens
Lens support fixed lens Samsung NX
Lens zoom range 36-107mm (3.0x) -
Highest aperture f/3.1-5.6 -
Macro focusing range 10cm -
Number of lenses - 32
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1.5
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Tilting
Display diagonal 2.5" 3.3"
Resolution of display 230 thousand dot 768 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Display tech - Active Matrix OLED screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Min shutter speed 4s 30s
Max shutter speed 1/2000s 1/6000s
Continuous shutter speed - 9.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 3.20 m no built-in flash
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) 1920 x 1080, 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240
Max video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video file format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None Optional
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 124 gr (0.27 lbs) 331 gr (0.73 lbs)
Dimensions 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") 122 x 64 x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 330 photos
Form of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID NP-82 BP1130
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) Yes (2 sec to 30 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots One One
Pricing at release $99 $699