Clicky

Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung PL200

Portability
96
Imaging
35
Features
14
Overall
26
Casio Exilim EX-Z35 front
 
Samsung PL200 front
Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
22
Overall
31

Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung PL200 Key Specs

Casio EX-Z35
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 3200
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
  • 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
  • Revealed February 2010
Samsung PL200
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
  • 170g - 100 x 60 x 21mm
  • Announced July 2010
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung PL200 Overview

Here, we are evaluating the Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung PL200, one being a Ultracompact and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-Z35 (12MP) and the PL200 (14MP) is fairly well matched and both cameras have the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The EX-Z35 was released 5 months before the PL200 and they are both of a similar generation. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-Z35 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung PL200 being a Compact camera.

Before we go into a thorough comparison, here is a brief summary of how the EX-Z35 scores versus the PL200 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Samsung PL200

 EX-Z35 PL200 
Focus manually Dial exact focusing

Reasons to pick Samsung PL200 over the Casio EX-Z35

 PL200 EX-Z35 
Display size3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")

Common features in the Casio EX-Z35 and Samsung PL200

 EX-Z35 PL200 
AnnouncedFebruary 2010July 2010Similar generation
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display resolution230k230kExact same display resolution
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither contains Touch friendly display

Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung PL200 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is going to lug around your camera often, you should factor its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z35 has got exterior dimensions of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") and a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Samsung PL200 has sizing of 100mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8") along with a weight of 170 grams (0.37 lbs).

Compare the Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung PL200 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-Z35 vs the PL200.

Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung PL200 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z35 and PL200 is 96 and 94 respectively.

Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung PL200 top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung PL200 Sensor Comparison

Normally, it's hard to imagine the difference between sensor measurements purely by reading through specs. The graphic underneath will offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z35 and PL200.

As you can plainly see, both cameras come with the identical sensor size but different MP. You should anticipate the Samsung PL200 to resolve greater detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images a good deal more aggressively.

Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung PL200 sensor size comparison

Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung PL200 Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung PL200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-Z35 Portrait photography factors
Samsung PL200 Portrait photography factors
27
has manual focus
manual mode not available
no external flash support
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
28
MP count decent (14MP)
manual focus not available
no manual control
can't use external flash
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Street photography with Casio EX-Z35
Street photography with Samsung PL200
48
screen is fixed
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
57
image stabilization (Optical)
screen is fixed
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-Z35 Sports photography features
Samsung PL200 Sports photography features
17
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
38
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (14MP)
lack of shutter priority mode
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect auto focus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-Z35 Travel photography factors
Samsung PL200 Travel photography factors
52
flash built-in
does not have Timelapse mode
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
wide angle not the best (36mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
58
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
missing Time Lapse function
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
wide angle not good (31mm)
slow max aperture (f3.3)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Casio EX-Z35
Landscape photography with Samsung PL200
28
has manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (36mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
screen is small (2.5")
manual mode not available
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
does not have Timelapse mode
37
screen size is decent (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (14MP)
manual focus not available
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (31mm)
slow max aperture (f3.3)
no manual control
small sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
missing Time Lapse function
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Casio EX-Z35
Vlogging with Samsung PL200
22
wide angle not the best (36mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
lack of image stabilization
low res video (640 x 480 pxls)
does not have external microphone port
25
image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not good (31mm)
slow max aperture (f3.3)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
video resolution low (640 x 480 resolution)
missing mic support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung PL200 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-Z35 and Samsung PL200
 Casio Exilim EX-Z35Samsung PL200
General Information
Brand Name Casio Samsung
Model Casio Exilim EX-Z35 Samsung PL200
Class Ultracompact Small Sensor Compact
Revealed 2010-02-21 2010-07-21
Physical type Ultracompact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip Exilim Engine 5.0 -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 14MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4000 x 3000 4320 x 3240
Maximum native ISO 3200 3200
Minimum native ISO 64 80
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 36-107mm (3.0x) 31-217mm (7.0x)
Largest aperture f/3.1-5.6 f/3.3-5.5
Macro focus range 10cm 5cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 2.5 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 230 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4s 8s
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000s 1/1500s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 3.20 m 4.60 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 640x480
Video file format Motion JPEG H.264
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 124 gr (0.27 lbs) 170 gr (0.37 lbs)
Physical dimensions 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") 100 x 60 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model NP-82 BP70A
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) Yes
Time lapse feature
Storage type SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC'/MMC, Internal
Card slots One One
Launch pricing $99 $0