Clicky

Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung SL202

Portability
96
Imaging
35
Features
14
Overall
26
Casio Exilim EX-Z35 front
 
Samsung SL202 front
Portability
94
Imaging
33
Features
17
Overall
26

Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs

Casio EX-Z35
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 3200
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
  • 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
  • Launched February 2010
Samsung SL202
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
  • 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
  • Released February 2009
  • Additionally referred to as PL50
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung SL202 Overview

Let's take a more detailed look at the Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung SL202, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-Z35 (12MP) and the SL202 (10MP) is pretty similar and they come with the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The EX-Z35 was announced 13 months after the SL202 which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-Z35 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung SL202 being a Compact camera.

Before diving in to a in-depth comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the EX-Z35 matches up versus the SL202 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Samsung SL202

 EX-Z35 SL202 
ReleasedFebruary 2010February 2009Newer by 13 months
Manually focus Very accurate focus

Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Casio EX-Z35

 SL202 EX-Z35 
Screen sizing2.7"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.2")

Common features in the Casio EX-Z35 and Samsung SL202

 EX-Z35 SL202 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen resolution230k230kEqual screen resolution
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch screen Absent Touch screen

Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison

In case you're aiming to travel with your camera, you'll need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-Z35 provides outside dimensions of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") along with a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Samsung SL202 has dimensions of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).

Take a look at the Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung SL202 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are employing at the time. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the EX-Z35 compared to the SL202.

Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung SL202 size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z35 and SL202 is 96 and 94 respectively.

Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung SL202 top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is very difficult to envision the gap between sensor dimensions merely by reviewing specifications. The image below might provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z35 and SL202.

Plainly, the two cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same resolution. You can expect the Casio EX-Z35 to offer you greater detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures far more aggressively. The newer EX-Z35 is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.

Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung SL202 sensor size comparison

Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung SL202 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-Z35 Portrait photography details
Samsung SL202 Portrait photography details
27
has manual focus
manual mode not available
external flash not possible
low MP (12 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW format
25
features face detect focus
no manual focus
no manual exposure
no external flash support
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Casio EX-Z35 Street photography factors
Samsung SL202 Street photography factors
48
fixed screen
no image stabilization
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW format
47
screen is fixed
lack of image stabilization
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-Z35 as a Sports photography camera
Samsung SL202 as a Sports photography camera
17
lack of shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
low MP (12 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no phase detect auto focus
16
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (10MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-Z35 Travel photography advice
Samsung SL202 Travel photography advice
52
built-in flash
doesn't have Timelapse recording
low MP (12MP)
display is not selfie friendly
wide angle not the best (36mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
57
flash built-in
fairly wide (28mm)
lack of Timelapse mode
megapixel count low (10MP)
display is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Casio EX-Z35
Landscape photography with Samsung SL202
28
has manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (36mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
tiny screen (2.5 inches)
manual mode not available
no image stabilization
low MP (12 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW format
doesn't have Timelapse recording
27
fairly wide (28mm)
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
small screen (2.7 inch)
no manual exposure
lack of image stabilization
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
lack of Timelapse mode
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Casio EX-Z35
Vlogging with Samsung SL202
22
wide angle not the best (36mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
display is not selfie friendly
no image stabilization
low quality video (640 x 480 pxls)
doesn't have external microphone socket
27
fairly wide (28mm)
features face detect focus
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
display is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
low res video (640 x 480 pixels)
lack of microphone jack
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung SL202 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-Z35 and Samsung SL202
 Casio Exilim EX-Z35Samsung SL202
General Information
Brand Casio Samsung
Model type Casio Exilim EX-Z35 Samsung SL202
Also referred to as - PL50
Class Ultracompact Small Sensor Compact
Launched 2010-02-21 2009-02-17
Body design Ultracompact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip Exilim Engine 5.0 -
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4000 x 3000 3648 x 2736
Maximum native ISO 3200 1600
Min native ISO 64 80
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 36-107mm (3.0x) 28-102mm (3.6x)
Max aperture f/3.1-5.6 f/2.8-5.7
Macro focusing distance 10cm 5cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.9
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 2.5 inches 2.7 inches
Resolution of display 230 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 seconds 8 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/1500 seconds
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 3.20 m 4.60 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 640x480
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 124 grams (0.27 lbs) 168 grams (0.37 lbs)
Dimensions 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID NP-82 SLB-10A
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) Yes
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Retail pricing $99 $140