Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung SL202
96 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
- Launched February 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Released February 2009
- Additionally referred to as PL50
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung SL202 Overview
Let's take a more detailed look at the Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung SL202, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-Z35 (12MP) and the SL202 (10MP) is pretty similar and they come with the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-Z35 was announced 13 months after the SL202 which makes the cameras a generation away from one another. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-Z35 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung SL202 being a Compact camera.
Before diving in to a in-depth comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the EX-Z35 matches up versus the SL202 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung SL202 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-Z35 & Samsung SL202. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-Z35 Gallery & Samsung SL202 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Samsung SL202
EX-Z35 | SL202 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2010 | February 2009 | Newer by 13 months | |
Manually focus | Very accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Casio EX-Z35
SL202 | EX-Z35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 2.7" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z35 and Samsung SL202
EX-Z35 | SL202 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Equal screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Absent Touch screen |
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to travel with your camera, you'll need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-Z35 provides outside dimensions of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") along with a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Samsung SL202 has dimensions of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung SL202 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are employing at the time. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the EX-Z35 compared to the SL202.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z35 and SL202 is 96 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very difficult to envision the gap between sensor dimensions merely by reviewing specifications. The image below might provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z35 and SL202.
Plainly, the two cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same resolution. You can expect the Casio EX-Z35 to offer you greater detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures far more aggressively. The newer EX-Z35 is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung SL202 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Samsung SL202 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Samsung |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Samsung SL202 |
Also referred to as | - | PL50 |
Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2010-02-21 | 2009-02-17 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Max aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/2.8-5.7 |
Macro focusing distance | 10cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.5 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.20 m | 4.60 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 124 grams (0.27 lbs) | 168 grams (0.37 lbs) |
Dimensions | 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-82 | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail pricing | $99 | $140 |