Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung SL620
96 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
94 Imaging
34 Features
13 Overall
25
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung SL620 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
- Announced February 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-175mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Launched February 2009
- Other Name is PL65
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung SL620 Overview
Here, we will be analyzing the Casio EX-Z35 and Samsung SL620, both Ultracompact digital cameras by companies Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-Z35 (12MP) and the SL620 (12MP) is pretty similar and both cameras provide the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-Z35 was released 13 months after the SL620 which makes them a generation away from one another. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before delving right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a short highlight of how the EX-Z35 grades versus the SL620 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung SL620 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-Z35 and Samsung SL620. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z35 Gallery and Samsung SL620 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Samsung SL620
| EX-Z35 | SL620 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2010 |  | February 2009 | More modern by 13 months |
| Manual focus |  | Very precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL620 over the Casio EX-Z35
| SL620 | EX-Z35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 2.7" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z35 and Samsung SL620
| EX-Z35 | SL620 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Equal screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung SL620 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry around your camera frequently, you have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-Z35 offers physical measurements of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") and a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Samsung SL620 has dimensions of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-Z35 and Samsung SL620 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are employing at that moment. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the EX-Z35 compared to the SL620.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z35 and SL620 is 96 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung SL620 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its tough to picture the contrast between sensor sizes only by going over a spec sheet. The pic here should provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z35 and SL620.
As you can see, the two cameras come with the identical sensor size and the same MP therefore you should expect similar quality of files though you will want to take the release date of the products into consideration. The younger EX-Z35 should have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung SL620 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung SL620 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Samsung SL620 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Samsung SL620 |
| Also called as | - | PL65 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2010-02-21 | 2009-02-17 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 35-175mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focus distance | 10cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.5 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.20 m | 4.60 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 124 gr (0.27 pounds) | 168 gr (0.37 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-82 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $99 | $200 |