Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB150F
96 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
93 Imaging
37 Features
42 Overall
39
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB150F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
- Announced February 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 188g - 107 x 61 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2012
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB150F Overview
Here, we are evaluating the Casio EX-Z35 and Samsung WB150F, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-Z35 (12MP) and the WB150F (14MP) is fairly comparable and both cameras offer the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-Z35 was brought out 22 months earlier than the WB150F making them a generation away from each other. The two cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-Z35 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB150F being a Compact camera.
Before we go right into a thorough comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the EX-Z35 matches up against the WB150F in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB150F Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-Z35 and Samsung WB150F. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z35 Gallery and Samsung WB150F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Samsung WB150F
| EX-Z35 | WB150F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB150F over the Casio EX-Z35
| WB150F | EX-Z35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2012 |  | February 2010 | Newer by 22 months |
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z35 and Samsung WB150F
| EX-Z35 | WB150F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither has Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB150F Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to travel with your camera frequently, you should factor its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z35 has exterior dimensions of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") having a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB150F has sizing of 107mm x 61mm x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 188 grams (0.41 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-Z35 and Samsung WB150F in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the EX-Z35 compared to the WB150F.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z35 and WB150F is 96 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB150F Sensor Comparison
Generally, its tough to imagine the gap in sensor dimensions only by going through a spec sheet. The pic underneath should give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z35 and WB150F.
Clearly, each of the cameras feature the identical sensor size but different megapixels. You should anticipate the Samsung WB150F to provide more detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos way more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z35 will be behind in sensor technology.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB150F Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB150F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Samsung WB150F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Samsung WB150F |
| Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2010-02-21 | 2012-01-09 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 10cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 16s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 10.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.20 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 124 grams (0.27 lb) | 188 grams (0.41 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 107 x 61 x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-82 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail price | $99 | $230 |