Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB210
96 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
94 Imaging
37 Features
45 Overall
40
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB210 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
- Revealed February 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Push to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F2.9-5.9) lens
- 174g - 101 x 59 x 22mm
- Launched July 2011
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB210 Overview
Its time to examine more closely at the Casio EX-Z35 versus Samsung WB210, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-Z35 (12MP) and the WB210 (14MP) is very well matched and they use the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-Z35 was launched 17 months earlier than the WB210 making the cameras a generation away from each other. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-Z35 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB210 being a Compact camera.
Before going straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the EX-Z35 scores against the WB210 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB210 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-Z35 and Samsung WB210. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-Z35 Gallery and Samsung WB210 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Samsung WB210
| EX-Z35 | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 1k | Sharper display (+229k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB210 over the Casio EX-Z35
| WB210 | EX-Z35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | July 2011 |  | February 2010 | More modern by 17 months |
| Display dimension | 3.5" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+1") |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z35 and Samsung WB210
| EX-Z35 | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen |
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB210 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry around your camera often, you'll have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-Z35 offers external measurements of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") along with a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Samsung WB210 has dimensions of 101mm x 59mm x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 174 grams (0.38 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-Z35 versus Samsung WB210 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are using at that time. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the EX-Z35 against the WB210.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z35 and WB210 is 96 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB210 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its tough to visualize the gap between sensor sizes purely by checking specifications. The image underneath should provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z35 and WB210.
To sum up, the 2 cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different megapixels. You should expect to see the Samsung WB210 to give more detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z35 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB210 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB210 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Samsung WB210 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Samsung WB210 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2010-02-21 | 2011-07-19 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/2.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 10cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.5" | 3.5" |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 1 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.20 m | 3.50 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 124g (0.27 lb) | 174g (0.38 lb) |
| Dimensions | 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 101 x 59 x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-82 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | microSC/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $99 | $279 |