Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB250F
96 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
93 Imaging
38 Features
44 Overall
40
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB250F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
- Revealed February 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 226g - 106 x 62 x 22mm
- Released January 2013
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB250F Overview
Here, we will be reviewing the Casio EX-Z35 versus Samsung WB250F, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-Z35 (12MP) and the WB250F (14MP) is relatively similar and both cameras offer the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe EX-Z35 was launched 3 years before the WB250F and that is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-Z35 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB250F being a Compact camera.
Before going straight to a full comparison, here is a quick summation of how the EX-Z35 grades vs the WB250F when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB250F Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z35 and Samsung WB250F. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z35 Gallery and Samsung WB250F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Samsung WB250F
| EX-Z35 | WB250F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focusing |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB250F over the Casio EX-Z35
| WB250F | EX-Z35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2013 |  | February 2010 | Fresher by 35 months |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z35 and Samsung WB250F
| EX-Z35 | WB250F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen |
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB250F Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry your camera frequently, you will need to factor in its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z35 has got external measurements of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") and a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Samsung WB250F has sizing of 106mm x 62mm x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-Z35 versus Samsung WB250F in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you use at that moment. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-Z35 and the WB250F.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z35 and WB250F is 96 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB250F Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be tough to envision the gap between sensor sizing only by reading a spec sheet. The graphic below will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-Z35 and WB250F.
Clearly, each of the cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same resolution. You should count on the Samsung WB250F to offer you extra detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will help you crop shots way more aggressively. The older EX-Z35 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB250F Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB250F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Samsung WB250F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Samsung WB250F |
| Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2010-02-21 | 2013-01-07 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | 10cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 16 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 8.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.20 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 124 gr (0.27 lbs) | 226 gr (0.50 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 106 x 62 x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-82 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $99 | $250 |