Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB800F
96 Imaging
34 Features
14 Overall
26
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
- Introduced February 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2013
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB800F Overview
Let's look more in depth at the Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB800F, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Casio and Samsung. There exists a substantial gap among the resolutions of the EX-Z35 (12MP) and WB800F (16MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-Z35 was brought out 3 years before the WB800F and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-Z35 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB800F being a Compact camera.
Before diving into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the EX-Z35 grades vs the WB800F in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z35 & Samsung WB800F. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z35 Gallery & Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Samsung WB800F
| EX-Z35 | WB800F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Casio EX-Z35
| WB800F | EX-Z35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2013 |  | February 2010 | More recent by 35 months |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z35 and Samsung WB800F
| EX-Z35 | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen |
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to lug around your camera regularly, you will want to take into account its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-Z35 has external dimensions of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") and a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB800F has proportions of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB800F in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have at that time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-Z35 against the WB800F.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z35 and WB800F is 96 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is tough to see the difference in sensor measurements only by looking through a spec sheet. The graphic here will give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z35 and WB800F.
As you can see, both of the cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same megapixels. You can count on the Samsung WB800F to result in greater detail having its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The older EX-Z35 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Casio EX-Z35 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Samsung WB800F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Samsung WB800F |
| Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2010-02-21 | 2013-01-07 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 10cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 16 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.20 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 124g (0.27 lbs) | 218g (0.48 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-82 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $99 | $300 |