Casio EX-Z35 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill
96 Imaging
34 Features
14 Overall
26
83 Imaging
55 Features
33 Overall
46
Casio EX-Z35 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
- Announced February 2010
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 640 x 480 video
- 50mm (F2.8) lens
- 330g - 122 x 67 x 59mm
- Launched February 2012
- Replaced the Sigma DP1 Merrill
- Newer Model is Sigma DP3 Merrill
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-Z35 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Overview
Let's look more closely at the Casio EX-Z35 and Sigma DP2 Merrill, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by manufacturers Casio and Sigma. The resolution of the EX-Z35 (12MP) and the DP2 Merrill (15MP) is pretty similar but the EX-Z35 (1/2.3") and DP2 Merrill (APS-C) boast totally different sensor measurements.
Photography GlossaryThe EX-Z35 was introduced 23 months earlier than the DP2 Merrill which makes them a generation away from each other. The two cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z35 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sigma DP2 Merrill being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before going into a in-depth comparison, here is a short highlight of how the EX-Z35 scores versus the DP2 Merrill for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-Z35 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-Z35 & Sigma DP2 Merrill. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z35 Gallery & Sigma DP2 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Sigma DP2 Merrill
| EX-Z35 | DP2 Merrill |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Merrill over the Casio EX-Z35
| DP2 Merrill | EX-Z35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2012 | February 2010 | Newer by 23 months | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
| Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z35 and Sigma DP2 Merrill
| EX-Z35 | DP2 Merrill | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | No Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-Z35 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to travel with your camera regularly, you will have to consider its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-Z35 comes with outer measurements of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") having a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Sigma DP2 Merrill has proportions of 122mm x 67mm x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") with a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-Z35 and Sigma DP2 Merrill in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have chosen at that moment. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-Z35 against the DP2 Merrill.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z35 and DP2 Merrill is 96 and 83 respectively.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Sensor Comparison
Often, its hard to see the difference between sensor dimensions only by going over a spec sheet. The pic here will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z35 and DP2 Merrill.
Clearly, both the cameras have different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The EX-Z35 using its tinier sensor will make getting bokeh tougher and the Sigma DP2 Merrill will deliver more detail using its extra 3 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z35 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-Z35 vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Sigma DP2 Merrill | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Sigma |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Sigma DP2 Merrill |
| Class | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2010-02-21 | 2012-02-08 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine 5.0 | Dual TRUE II engine |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 24 x 16mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 384.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 15 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4704 x 3136 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 50mm (1x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | 10cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230k dot | 920k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | - |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | - |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 4.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.20 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 640x480 |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 124g (0.27 pounds) | 330g (0.73 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 122 x 67 x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-82 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | - |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $99 | $931 |