Casio EX-Z35 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill
96 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
57 Imaging
56 Features
45 Overall
51
Casio EX-Z35 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
- Launched February 2010
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 790g - 146 x 113 x 80mm
- Released April 2012
- Earlier Model is Sigma SD1
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-Z35 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Overview
On this page, we will be looking at the Casio EX-Z35 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Advanced DSLR by competitors Casio and Sigma. The image resolution of the EX-Z35 (12MP) and the SD1 Merrill (15MP) is relatively comparable but the EX-Z35 (1/2.3") and SD1 Merrill (APS-C) have totally different sensor size.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-Z35 was unveiled 3 years before the SD1 Merrill and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z35 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sigma SD1 Merrill being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before getting right into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise overview of how the EX-Z35 grades vs the SD1 Merrill with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-Z35 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z35 & Sigma SD1 Merrill. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z35 Gallery & Sigma SD1 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Sigma SD1 Merrill
| EX-Z35 | SD1 Merrill |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sigma SD1 Merrill over the Casio EX-Z35
| SD1 Merrill | EX-Z35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | April 2012 |  | February 2010 | More recent by 25 months |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z35 and Sigma SD1 Merrill
| EX-Z35 | SD1 Merrill | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Missing Touch screen |
Casio EX-Z35 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Physical Comparison
If you are looking to lug around your camera, you'll have to factor its weight and size. The Casio EX-Z35 comes with physical measurements of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") having a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Sigma SD1 Merrill has specifications of 146mm x 113mm x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") having a weight of 790 grams (1.74 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-Z35 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-Z35 versus the SD1 Merrill.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z35 and SD1 Merrill is 96 and 57 respectively.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very tough to see the contrast in sensor measurements merely by seeing specifications. The photograph underneath will help provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-Z35 and SD1 Merrill.
Plainly, both of the cameras have different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The EX-Z35 having a smaller sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field more challenging and the Sigma SD1 Merrill will show more detail having an extra 3 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The older EX-Z35 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Casio EX-Z35 vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Sigma SD1 Merrill | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Sigma |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Sigma SD1 Merrill |
| Class | Ultracompact | Advanced DSLR |
| Launched | 2010-02-21 | 2012-04-10 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | Dual True II |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 24 x 16mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 384.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 15 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4800 x 3200 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
| Lens zoom range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | - |
| Largest aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 10cm | - |
| Amount of lenses | - | 76 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 96% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | - |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.20 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | - |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | None |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 124 grams (0.27 lb) | 790 grams (1.74 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 146 x 113 x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-82 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Compact Flash (Type I, UDMA compatible) |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $99 | $2,339 |