Olympus E-M5 III vs Panasonic FS15
80 Imaging
61 Features
88 Overall
71
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2c365/2c36512778594cdfbf2b2301f5cdebbcaebbc0db" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M5 III front Olympus OM-D E-M5 III front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/14843/14843fe54ad829f1dcedf3904c1935557340eb3f" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS15 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS15 front"
95 Imaging
34 Features
17 Overall
27
Olympus E-M5 III vs Panasonic FS15 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 414g - 125 x 85 x 50mm
- Launched October 2019
- Old Model is Olympus E-M5 II
- Replacement is OM System OM-5
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Increase to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 29-145mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 136g - 97 x 54 x 22mm
- Released January 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 III vs Panasonic FS15 Overview
Here is a extended analysis of the Olympus E-M5 III versus Panasonic FS15, former being a Advanced Mirrorless while the other is a Ultracompact by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a sizable gap between the resolutions of the E-M5 III (20MP) and FS15 (12MP) and the E-M5 III (Four Thirds) and FS15 (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The E-M5 III was announced 10 years later than the FS15 and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M5 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FS15 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a short highlight of how the E-M5 III scores versus the FS15 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 III vs Panasonic FS15 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M5 III & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS15. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-M5 III Gallery & Panasonic FS15 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M5 III over the Panasonic FS15
E-M5 III | FS15 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | October 2019 | ![]() | January 2009 | Fresher by 131 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+810k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FS15 over the Olympus E-M5 III
FS15 | E-M5 III |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M5 III and Panasonic FS15
E-M5 III | FS15 |
---|
Olympus E-M5 III vs Panasonic FS15 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry your camera frequently, you will need to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-M5 III comes with exterior dimensions of 125mm x 85mm x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") having a weight of 414 grams (0.91 lbs) while the Panasonic FS15 has specifications of 97mm x 54mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.1" x 0.9") with a weight of 136 grams (0.30 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-M5 III versus Panasonic FS15 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you select at that time. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the E-M5 III and the FS15.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5db9a/5db9aba9b335d7116b8bd0b5b4f6eeab7cd53ffa" alt="Olympus E-M5 III vs Panasonic FS15 size comparison Olympus E-M5 III vs Panasonic FS15 size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M5 III and FS15 is 80 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2410f/2410fe8019c51503c12839f57012e5eb26578749" alt="Olympus E-M5 III vs Panasonic FS15 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M5 III vs Panasonic FS15 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M5 III vs Panasonic FS15 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be difficult to envision the difference between sensor sizing simply by looking at specifications. The graphic here should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M5 III and FS15.
To sum up, both cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-M5 III having a larger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-M5 III will resolve greater detail with its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop photos far more aggressively. The fresher E-M5 III will have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/22b78/22b782f771642a138cde369c9027bf4488a749b2" alt="Olympus E-M5 III vs Panasonic FS15 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M5 III vs Panasonic FS15 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M5 III vs Panasonic FS15 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/531fd/531fd9a9c1e0cc019783e4a393495b30855202ce" alt="Olympus E-M5 III vs Panasonic FS15 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M5 III vs Panasonic FS15 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus E-M5 III vs Panasonic FS15 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS15 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M5 III | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS15 |
Category | Advanced Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2019-10-17 | 2009-01-16 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VIII | - |
Sensor type | MOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.4 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 226.2mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 20MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 5184 x 3888 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 64 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 121 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 29-145mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 5cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of screen | 1,040 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/8000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Max silent shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 30.0 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | - |
Flash options | Auto, redeye, fill, off, redeye slow sync, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, Auto Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | 1/250 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 640x480 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 414g (0.91 pounds) | 136g (0.30 pounds) |
Dimensions | 125 x 85 x 50mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 2.0") | 97 x 54 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.1" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 310 images | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLN-1 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $1,199 | $180 |