Casio EX-Z35 vs Sigma SD10
96 Imaging
34 Features
14 Overall
26
54 Imaging
39 Features
27 Overall
34
Casio EX-Z35 vs Sigma SD10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
- Launched February 2010
(Full Review)
- 3MP - APS-C Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 800 (Bump to 1600)
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 950g - 152 x 120 x 79mm
- Revealed March 2004
- Previous Model is Sigma SD9
- Updated by Sigma SD14
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-Z35 vs Sigma SD10 Overview
Its time to look more in depth at the Casio EX-Z35 and Sigma SD10, one is a Ultracompact and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by manufacturers Casio and Sigma. There exists a sizeable gap among the image resolutions of the EX-Z35 (12MP) and SD10 (3MP) and the EX-Z35 (1/2.3") and SD10 (APS-C) provide totally different sensor size.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-Z35 was unveiled 6 years after the SD10 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-Z35 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sigma SD10 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before delving right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick summation of how the EX-Z35 grades versus the SD10 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-Z35 vs Sigma SD10 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-Z35 and Sigma SD10. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z35 Gallery and Sigma SD10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Sigma SD10
| EX-Z35 | SD10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2010 | March 2004 | Newer by 73 months | |
| Screen size | 2.5" | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+0.7") | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 130k | Clearer screen (+100k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD10 over the Casio EX-Z35
| SD10 | EX-Z35 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-Z35 and Sigma SD10
| EX-Z35 | SD10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Dial exact focus | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Neither includes Touch screen |
Casio EX-Z35 vs Sigma SD10 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you have to factor its weight and size. The Casio EX-Z35 features external dimensions of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) while the Sigma SD10 has specifications of 152mm x 120mm x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") accompanied by a weight of 950 grams (2.09 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-Z35 and Sigma SD10 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have chosen at that time. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the EX-Z35 and the SD10.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z35 and SD10 is 96 and 54 respectively.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Sigma SD10 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be tough to see the difference in sensor dimensions just by going through specifications. The image here will help give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z35 and SD10.
Plainly, the 2 cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The EX-Z35 having a smaller sensor will make shooting shallower DOF more difficult and the Casio EX-Z35 will produce greater detail having an extra 9MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The fresher EX-Z35 will have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Sigma SD10 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Casio EX-Z35 vs Sigma SD10 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Sigma SD10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Sigma |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Sigma SD10 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Advanced DSLR |
| Launched | 2010-02-21 | 2004-03-19 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 285.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 3 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 2268 x 1512 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 800 |
| Max enhanced ISO | - | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
| Lens focal range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | - |
| Largest aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | - |
| Macro focus range | 10cm | - |
| Number of lenses | - | 76 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.5 inch | 1.8 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 130 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 98% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.77x |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/6000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.20 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash synchronize | - | 1/180 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | - |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | None |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 124 gr (0.27 pounds) | 950 gr (2.09 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 152 x 120 x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-82 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Compact Flash Type I or II |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Price at release | $99 | $198 |