Casio EX-Z35 vs Sigma SD14
96 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
59 Imaging
42 Features
30 Overall
37
Casio EX-Z35 vs Sigma SD14 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
- Introduced February 2010
(Full Review)
- 5MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800 (Push to 1600)
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 750g - 144 x 107 x 81mm
- Announced September 2006
- Previous Model is Sigma SD10
- Newer Model is Sigma SD15
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-Z35 vs Sigma SD14 Overview
Let's take a deeper look at the Casio EX-Z35 vs Sigma SD14, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Advanced DSLR by brands Casio and Sigma. There exists a crucial gap among the image resolutions of the EX-Z35 (12MP) and SD14 (5MP) and the EX-Z35 (1/2.3") and SD14 (APS-C) possess totally different sensor dimensions.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-Z35 was revealed 3 years after the SD14 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-Z35 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sigma SD14 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before we go through a in depth comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the EX-Z35 grades versus the SD14 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-Z35 vs Sigma SD14 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-Z35 and Sigma SD14. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z35 Gallery and Sigma SD14 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Sigma SD14
| EX-Z35 | SD14 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2010 |  | September 2006 | Newer by 42 months |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 150k | Clearer display (+80k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD14 over the Casio EX-Z35
| SD14 | EX-Z35 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-Z35 and Sigma SD14
| EX-Z35 | SD14 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 2.5" |  | 2.5" | Equivalent display sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither features Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-Z35 vs Sigma SD14 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to travel with your camera, you will have to take into account its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z35 enjoys outer dimensions of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") with a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Sigma SD14 has sizing of 144mm x 107mm x 81mm (5.7" x 4.2" x 3.2") and a weight of 750 grams (1.65 lbs).
See the Casio EX-Z35 vs Sigma SD14 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have chosen at that time. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the EX-Z35 compared to the SD14.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z35 and SD14 is 96 and 59 respectively.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Sigma SD14 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's difficult to see the contrast in sensor dimensions just by seeing a spec sheet. The image underneath might provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z35 and SD14.
As you can see, both of those cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The EX-Z35 having a smaller sensor will make getting shallower DOF more challenging and the Casio EX-Z35 will show extra detail because of its extra 7 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images a little more aggressively. The fresher EX-Z35 is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Sigma SD14 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-Z35 vs Sigma SD14 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Sigma SD14 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Sigma |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Sigma SD14 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Advanced DSLR |
| Introduced | 2010-02-21 | 2006-09-26 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 285.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 5MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 2640 x 1760 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 800 |
| Highest boosted ISO | - | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
| Lens focal range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | - |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 10cm | - |
| Available lenses | - | 76 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.7 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 2.5 inches | 2.5 inches |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 150 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 98% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.6x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 3.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.20 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | - | 1/180s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | - |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | None |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 124 grams (0.27 lb) | 750 grams (1.65 lb) |
| Dimensions | 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 144 x 107 x 81mm (5.7" x 4.2" x 3.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-82 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Compact Flash Type I or II |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $99 | $198 |