Casio EX-Z35 vs Sigma fp
96 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26


84 Imaging
75 Features
79 Overall
76
Casio EX-Z35 vs Sigma fp Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
- Launched February 2010
(Full Review)
- 25MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3.2" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Bump to 102400)
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Leica L Mount
- 422g - 113 x 70 x 45mm
- Launched July 2019
- Replacement is Sigma fp L

Casio EX-Z35 vs Sigma fp Overview
Following is a extended overview of the Casio EX-Z35 versus Sigma fp, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by manufacturers Casio and Sigma. There exists a sizable gap between the sensor resolutions of the EX-Z35 (12MP) and fp (25MP) and the EX-Z35 (1/2.3") and fp (Full frame) boast totally different sensor size.

The EX-Z35 was announced 10 years earlier than the fp which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z35 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sigma fp being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go right into a in-depth comparison, here is a quick summary of how the EX-Z35 matches up vs the fp with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Casio EX-Z35 vs Sigma fp Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-Z35 & Sigma fp. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-Z35 Gallery & Sigma fp Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Sigma fp
EX-Z35 | fp |
---|
Reasons to pick Sigma fp over the Casio EX-Z35
fp | EX-Z35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | July 2019 | ![]() | February 2010 | More modern by 114 months |
Screen dimensions | 3.2" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.7") |
Screen resolution | 2100k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+1870k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z35 and Sigma fp
EX-Z35 | fp | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focus | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen |
Casio EX-Z35 vs Sigma fp Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry around your camera regularly, you're going to have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-Z35 enjoys external dimensions of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") with a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Sigma fp has dimensions of 113mm x 70mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 1.8") along with a weight of 422 grams (0.93 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-Z35 versus Sigma fp in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the EX-Z35 compared to the fp.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z35 and fp is 96 and 84 respectively.

Casio EX-Z35 vs Sigma fp Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be tough to visualise the contrast between sensor sizes merely by going over specifications. The image below may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z35 and fp.
To sum up, each of these cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The EX-Z35 having a tinier sensor will make achieving shallower DOF trickier and the Sigma fp will offer you more detail with its extra 13 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z35 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.

Casio EX-Z35 vs Sigma fp Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-Z35 vs Sigma fp Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Sigma fp | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Sigma |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Sigma fp |
Type | Ultracompact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Launched | 2010-02-21 | 2019-07-11 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 35.9 x 23.9mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 858.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 25MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 6000 x 4000 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 102400 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | - | 6 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Leica L |
Lens focal range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | - |
Macro focus distance | 10cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 30 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.5 inches | 3.2 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 2,100 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/8000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 12.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.20 m | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | No |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | Yes |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 124 grams (0.27 lbs) | 422 grams (0.93 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 113 x 70 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 1.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-82 | BP-51 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 wec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported) |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $99 | $2,050 |