Clicky

Casio EX-Z35 vs Sigma fp

Portability
96
Imaging
35
Features
14
Overall
26
Casio Exilim EX-Z35 front
 
Sigma fp front
Portability
84
Imaging
75
Features
79
Overall
76

Casio EX-Z35 vs Sigma fp Key Specs

Casio EX-Z35
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 3200
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
  • 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
  • Launched February 2010
Sigma fp
(Full Review)
  • 25MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 3.2" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 25600 (Bump to 102400)
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Leica L Mount
  • 422g - 113 x 70 x 45mm
  • Launched July 2019
  • Replacement is Sigma fp L
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Casio EX-Z35 vs Sigma fp Overview

Following is a extended overview of the Casio EX-Z35 versus Sigma fp, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by manufacturers Casio and Sigma. There exists a sizable gap between the sensor resolutions of the EX-Z35 (12MP) and fp (25MP) and the EX-Z35 (1/2.3") and fp (Full frame) boast totally different sensor size.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The EX-Z35 was announced 10 years earlier than the fp which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z35 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sigma fp being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before we go right into a in-depth comparison, here is a quick summary of how the EX-Z35 matches up vs the fp with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photography Glossary

        

Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Sigma fp

 EX-Z35 fp 

Reasons to pick Sigma fp over the Casio EX-Z35

 fp EX-Z35 
LaunchedJuly 2019February 2010More modern by 114 months
Screen dimensions3.2"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.7")
Screen resolution2100k230kCrisper screen (+1870k dot)
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Casio EX-Z35 and Sigma fp

 EX-Z35 fp 
Manually focus Dial accurate focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen

Casio EX-Z35 vs Sigma fp Physical Comparison

For those who are looking to carry around your camera regularly, you're going to have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-Z35 enjoys external dimensions of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") with a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Sigma fp has dimensions of 113mm x 70mm x 45mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 1.8") along with a weight of 422 grams (0.93 lbs).

Check out the Casio EX-Z35 versus Sigma fp in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the EX-Z35 compared to the fp.

Casio EX-Z35 vs Sigma fp size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z35 and fp is 96 and 84 respectively.

Casio EX-Z35 vs Sigma fp top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-Z35 vs Sigma fp Sensor Comparison

Normally, it can be tough to visualise the contrast between sensor sizes merely by going over specifications. The image below may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z35 and fp.

To sum up, each of these cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The EX-Z35 having a tinier sensor will make achieving shallower DOF trickier and the Sigma fp will offer you more detail with its extra 13 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z35 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.

Casio EX-Z35 vs Sigma fp sensor size comparison

Casio EX-Z35 vs Sigma fp Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-Z35 vs Sigma fp Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-Z35 Portrait photography advice
Sigma fp Portrait photography advice
27
you can focus manually
no manual mode
external flash not possible
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
85
you can focus manually
sensor resolution is high (25MP)
big sensor size (Full frame)
offers face detection focusing
exports RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Casio EX-Z35 Street photography info
Sigma fp Street photography info
48
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
77
big sensor size (Full frame)
exports RAW files
has focus via touch
weather proofing
great high ISO (25,600)
no moving screen
no image stabilization
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-Z35 Sports photography factors
Sigma fp Sports photography factors
17
no shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
73
max shutter speed is good (1/8,000 seconds)
sensor resolution is high (25 megapixels)
big sensor size (Full frame)
offers tracking autofocus
weather proofing
no image stabilization
no phase detect AF
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-Z35 as a Travel photography camera
Sigma fp as a Travel photography camera
52
has built in flash
does not have Time Lapse function
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
wide angle not the best (36mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
78
weather proofing
has focus via touch
sensor resolution is high (25MP)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-Z35 Landscape photography factors
Sigma fp Landscape photography factors
28
you can focus manually
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (36mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
screen is small (2.5 inches)
no manual mode
lack of image stabilization
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
does not have Time Lapse function
82
you can focus manually
change lenses (Leica L mount)
screen is a decent size (3.2 inch)
sensor resolution is high (25MP)
big sensor size (Full frame)
great high ISO (25,600)
exports RAW files
weather proofing
no image stabilization
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Casio EX-Z35
Vlogging with Sigma fp
22
wide angle not the best (36mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
display is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
low res video (640 x 480 pxls)
does not have mic port
37
touchscreen capability
offers face detection focusing
high res video (3840 x 2160 resolution)
has external microphone support
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
no image stabilization
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Casio EX-Z35 vs Sigma fp Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-Z35 and Sigma fp
 Casio Exilim EX-Z35Sigma fp
General Information
Company Casio Sigma
Model Casio Exilim EX-Z35 Sigma fp
Type Ultracompact Advanced Mirrorless
Launched 2010-02-21 2019-07-11
Physical type Ultracompact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Powered by Exilim Engine 5.0 -
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" Full frame
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 35.9 x 23.9mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 858.0mm²
Sensor resolution 12MP 25MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4000 x 3000 6000 x 4000
Maximum native ISO 3200 25600
Maximum boosted ISO - 102400
Minimum native ISO 64 100
RAW images
Minimum boosted ISO - 6
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points - 49
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens Leica L
Lens focal range 36-107mm (3.0x) -
Maximum aperture f/3.1-5.6 -
Macro focus distance 10cm -
Number of lenses - 30
Crop factor 5.8 1
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 2.5 inches 3.2 inches
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dots 2,100 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4 seconds 30 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/8000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate - 12.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 3.20 m no built-in flash
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft no built-in flash
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
Maximum video resolution 640x480 3840x2160
Video format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None No
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) Yes
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 124 grams (0.27 lbs) 422 grams (0.93 lbs)
Physical dimensions 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") 113 x 70 x 45mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 1.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model NP-82 BP-51
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) Yes (2 or 10 wec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-II supported)
Card slots 1 1
Pricing at launch $99 $2,050