Clicky

Casio EX-Z35 vs Sigma Quattro H

Portability
96
Imaging
34
Features
14
Overall
26
Casio Exilim EX-Z35 front
 
Sigma sd Quattro H front
Portability
78
Imaging
71
Features
59
Overall
66

Casio EX-Z35 vs Sigma Quattro H Key Specs

Casio EX-Z35
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 3200
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
  • 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
  • Revealed February 2010
Sigma Quattro H
(Full Review)
  • 45MP - APS-H Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sigma SA Mount
  • n/ag - 147 x 95 x 91mm
  • Introduced February 2016
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Casio EX-Z35 vs Sigma Quattro H Overview

Below, we are reviewing the Casio EX-Z35 and Sigma Quattro H, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Casio and Sigma. There is a considerable difference between the resolutions of the EX-Z35 (12MP) and Quattro H (45MP) and the EX-Z35 (1/2.3") and Quattro H (APS-H) feature totally different sensor measurements.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The EX-Z35 was manufactured 7 years earlier than the Quattro H which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-Z35 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sigma Quattro H being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before going through a in-depth comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the EX-Z35 scores vs the Quattro H with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

        

Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Sigma Quattro H

 EX-Z35 Quattro H 

Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro H over the Casio EX-Z35

 Quattro H EX-Z35 
IntroducedFebruary 2016February 2010Newer by 73 months
Display dimension3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution1620k230kSharper display (+1390k dot)

Common features in the Casio EX-Z35 and Sigma Quattro H

 EX-Z35 Quattro H 
Focus manually Very precise focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch display Lack of Touch display

Casio EX-Z35 vs Sigma Quattro H Physical Comparison

For anyone who is going to travel with your camera, you have to think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z35 features exterior dimensions of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") and a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Sigma Quattro H has sizing of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).

Check the Casio EX-Z35 and Sigma Quattro H in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have attached at that time. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the EX-Z35 and the Quattro H.

Casio EX-Z35 vs Sigma Quattro H size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z35 and Quattro H is 96 and 78 respectively.

Casio EX-Z35 vs Sigma Quattro H top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-Z35 vs Sigma Quattro H Sensor Comparison

Often, it's tough to see the difference between sensor dimensions purely by reviewing specifications. The image here should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z35 and Quattro H.

Plainly, both cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The EX-Z35 featuring a tinier sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field trickier and the Sigma Quattro H will offer more detail due to its extra 33MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics much more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z35 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.

Casio EX-Z35 vs Sigma Quattro H sensor size comparison

Casio EX-Z35 vs Sigma Quattro H Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-Z35 vs Sigma Quattro H Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Casio EX-Z35
Portrait photography with Sigma Quattro H
27
has manual focus
manual exposure not available
cannot use external flash
sensor resolution not great (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
82
you can focus manually
resolution is amazing (45 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-H)
provides face detect focusing
delivers RAW formats
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Street photography with Casio EX-Z35
Street photography with Sigma Quattro H
48
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
69
sensor size is good (APS-H)
delivers RAW formats
weather sealing
no moving screen
lack of image stabilization
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-Z35 Sports photography information
Sigma Quattro H Sports photography information
17
no shutter priority
no image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
71
resolution is amazing (45 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-H)
provides tracking focus
weather sealing
sensor has phase detect AF
low frames per second (3.8 fps)
lack of image stabilization
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-Z35 as a Travel photography camera
Sigma Quattro H as a Travel photography camera
51
flash built-in
no Timelapse function
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
wide angle not great (36mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
65
weather sealing
resolution is amazing (45MP)
no Timelapse recording
does not have a selfie friendly display
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Casio EX-Z35
Landscape photography with Sigma Quattro H
27
has manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (36mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
tiny screen (2.5 inches)
manual exposure not available
no image stabilization
sensor resolution not great (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
no Timelapse function
75
you can focus manually
interchangeable lenses (Sigma SA mount)
screen is a good size (3 inches)
resolution is amazing (45MP)
sensor size is good (APS-H)
delivers RAW formats
weather sealing
lack of image stabilization
no Timelapse recording
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-Z35 Vlogging information
Sigma Quattro H Vlogging information
22
wide angle not great (36mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
no image stabilization
low quality video (640 x 480 pixels)
no microphone jack
26
provides face detect focusing
does not have a selfie friendly display
lack of image stabilization
low video resolution ( pxls)
no microphone support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Casio EX-Z35 vs Sigma Quattro H Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-Z35 and Sigma Quattro H
 Casio Exilim EX-Z35Sigma sd Quattro H
General Information
Brand Casio Sigma
Model type Casio Exilim EX-Z35 Sigma sd Quattro H
Class Ultracompact Advanced Mirrorless
Revealed 2010-02-21 2016-02-23
Physical type Ultracompact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Chip Exilim Engine 5.0 Dual TRUE III
Sensor type CCD CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-H
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 26.6 x 17.9mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 476.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 45 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 4000 x 3000 6200 x 4152
Max native ISO 3200 6400
Lowest native ISO 64 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Total focus points - 9
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens Sigma SA
Lens zoom range 36-107mm (3.0x) -
Max aperture f/3.1-5.6 -
Macro focusing distance 10cm -
Total lenses - 76
Crop factor 5.8 1.4
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 2.5 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 230k dots 1,620k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,360k dots
Viewfinder coverage - 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.73x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4 secs 30 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shutter rate - 3.8 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 3.20 m no built-in flash
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft no built-in flash
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) -
Max video resolution 640x480 -
Video data format Motion JPEG -
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 124g (0.27 lb) -
Dimensions 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID NP-82 BP-61
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) Yes
Time lapse shooting
Storage type SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots One One
Retail price $99 $1,134