Casio EX-Z35 vs Sigma Quattro H
96 Imaging
34 Features
14 Overall
26
78 Imaging
71 Features
59 Overall
66
Casio EX-Z35 vs Sigma Quattro H Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
- Revealed February 2010
(Full Review)
- 45MP - APS-H Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- n/ag - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Introduced February 2016
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-Z35 vs Sigma Quattro H Overview
Below, we are reviewing the Casio EX-Z35 and Sigma Quattro H, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Casio and Sigma. There is a considerable difference between the resolutions of the EX-Z35 (12MP) and Quattro H (45MP) and the EX-Z35 (1/2.3") and Quattro H (APS-H) feature totally different sensor measurements.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-Z35 was manufactured 7 years earlier than the Quattro H which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-Z35 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sigma Quattro H being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going through a in-depth comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the EX-Z35 scores vs the Quattro H with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-Z35 vs Sigma Quattro H Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-Z35 & Sigma sd Quattro H. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-Z35 Gallery & Sigma Quattro H Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Sigma Quattro H
| EX-Z35 | Quattro H |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro H over the Casio EX-Z35
| Quattro H | EX-Z35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2016 | February 2010 | Newer by 73 months | |
| Display dimension | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
| Display resolution | 1620k | 230k | Sharper display (+1390k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z35 and Sigma Quattro H
| EX-Z35 | Quattro H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Very precise focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Lack of Touch display |
Casio EX-Z35 vs Sigma Quattro H Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to travel with your camera, you have to think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z35 features exterior dimensions of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") and a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Sigma Quattro H has sizing of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") and a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-Z35 and Sigma Quattro H in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have attached at that time. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the EX-Z35 and the Quattro H.

Considering size and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z35 and Quattro H is 96 and 78 respectively.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Sigma Quattro H Sensor Comparison
Often, it's tough to see the difference between sensor dimensions purely by reviewing specifications. The image here should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z35 and Quattro H.
Plainly, both cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The EX-Z35 featuring a tinier sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field trickier and the Sigma Quattro H will offer more detail due to its extra 33MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics much more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z35 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Sigma Quattro H Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Casio EX-Z35 vs Sigma Quattro H Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Sigma sd Quattro H | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Sigma |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Sigma sd Quattro H |
| Class | Ultracompact | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Revealed | 2010-02-21 | 2016-02-23 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | Dual TRUE III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-H |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 26.6 x 17.9mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 476.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 45 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 6200 x 4152 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
| Lens zoom range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | - |
| Max aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 10cm | - |
| Total lenses | - | 76 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.4 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.5 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 1,620k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 3.8 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.20 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | - |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | - |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 124g (0.27 lb) | - |
| Dimensions | 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-82 | BP-61 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail price | $99 | $1,134 |