Casio EX-Z35 vs Sony NEX-3N
96 Imaging
34 Features
14 Overall
26
89 Imaging
56 Features
52 Overall
54
Casio EX-Z35 vs Sony NEX-3N Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
- Revealed February 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 16000
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony E Mount
- 269g - 110 x 62 x 35mm
- Introduced February 2013
- Replaced the Sony NEX-F3
- Renewed by Sony a5000
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-Z35 vs Sony NEX-3N Overview
In this article, we are looking at the Casio EX-Z35 and Sony NEX-3N, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Casio and Sony. There is a huge difference among the sensor resolutions of the EX-Z35 (12MP) and NEX-3N (16MP) and the EX-Z35 (1/2.3") and NEX-3N (APS-C) possess totally different sensor measurements.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-Z35 was introduced 4 years before the NEX-3N which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-Z35 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony NEX-3N being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go in to a detailed comparison, below is a quick summary of how the EX-Z35 grades against the NEX-3N for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-Z35 vs Sony NEX-3N Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-Z35 and Sony Alpha NEX-3N. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-Z35 Gallery and Sony NEX-3N Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Sony NEX-3N
| EX-Z35 | NEX-3N |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony NEX-3N over the Casio EX-Z35
| NEX-3N | EX-Z35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2013 | February 2010 | More modern by 36 months | |
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z35 and Sony NEX-3N
| EX-Z35 | NEX-3N | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | More precise focus | |||
| Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | No Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-Z35 vs Sony NEX-3N Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry around your camera often, you'll have to factor its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-Z35 has got physical measurements of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") having a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Sony NEX-3N has measurements of 110mm x 62mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.4") and a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).
See the Casio EX-Z35 and Sony NEX-3N in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are using at that moment. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the EX-Z35 against the NEX-3N.

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z35 and NEX-3N is 96 and 89 respectively.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Sony NEX-3N Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's difficult to envision the contrast in sensor sizes merely by going through a spec sheet. The image underneath will give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-Z35 and NEX-3N.
Clearly, both of these cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The EX-Z35 with its smaller sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field harder and the Sony NEX-3N will produce extra detail using its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images a little more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z35 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Sony NEX-3N Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-Z35 vs Sony NEX-3N Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Sony Alpha NEX-3N | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Sony |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Sony Alpha NEX-3N |
| Class | Ultracompact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Revealed | 2010-02-21 | 2013-02-25 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | Bionz |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4912 x 3264 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 16000 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 200 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | Sony E |
| Lens zoom range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | - |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 10cm | - |
| Total lenses | - | 121 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen sizing | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 4.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.20 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Fastest flash sync | - | 1/160s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 124g (0.27 lb) | 269g (0.59 lb) |
| Dimensions | 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 110 x 62 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 74 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.8 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.5 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1067 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 480 images |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-82 | NPFW50 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $99 | $399 |