Clicky

Casio EX-Z35 vs Sony NEX-3N

Portability
96
Imaging
34
Features
14
Overall
26
Casio Exilim EX-Z35 front
 
Sony Alpha NEX-3N front
Portability
89
Imaging
56
Features
52
Overall
54

Casio EX-Z35 vs Sony NEX-3N Key Specs

Casio EX-Z35
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 3200
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
  • 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
  • Revealed February 2010
Sony NEX-3N
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 200 - 16000
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Sony E Mount
  • 269g - 110 x 62 x 35mm
  • Introduced February 2013
  • Replaced the Sony NEX-F3
  • Renewed by Sony a5000
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Casio EX-Z35 vs Sony NEX-3N Overview

In this article, we are looking at the Casio EX-Z35 and Sony NEX-3N, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Casio and Sony. There is a huge difference among the sensor resolutions of the EX-Z35 (12MP) and NEX-3N (16MP) and the EX-Z35 (1/2.3") and NEX-3N (APS-C) possess totally different sensor measurements.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The EX-Z35 was introduced 4 years before the NEX-3N which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-Z35 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony NEX-3N being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before we go in to a detailed comparison, below is a quick summary of how the EX-Z35 grades against the NEX-3N for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

        

Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Sony NEX-3N

 EX-Z35 NEX-3N 

Reasons to pick Sony NEX-3N over the Casio EX-Z35

 NEX-3N EX-Z35 
IntroducedFebruary 2013February 2010More modern by 36 months
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display sizing3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution460k230kClearer display (+230k dot)

Common features in the Casio EX-Z35 and Sony NEX-3N

 EX-Z35 NEX-3N 
Manually focus More precise focus
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch friendly display No Touch friendly display

Casio EX-Z35 vs Sony NEX-3N Physical Comparison

If you're going to carry around your camera often, you'll have to factor its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-Z35 has got physical measurements of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") having a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Sony NEX-3N has measurements of 110mm x 62mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.4") and a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).

See the Casio EX-Z35 and Sony NEX-3N in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are using at that moment. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the EX-Z35 against the NEX-3N.

Casio EX-Z35 vs Sony NEX-3N size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z35 and NEX-3N is 96 and 89 respectively.

Casio EX-Z35 vs Sony NEX-3N top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-Z35 vs Sony NEX-3N Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it's difficult to envision the contrast in sensor sizes merely by going through a spec sheet. The image underneath will give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-Z35 and NEX-3N.

Clearly, both of these cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The EX-Z35 with its smaller sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field harder and the Sony NEX-3N will produce extra detail using its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop images a little more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z35 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.

Casio EX-Z35 vs Sony NEX-3N sensor size comparison

Casio EX-Z35 vs Sony NEX-3N Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-Z35 vs Sony NEX-3N Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-Z35 as a Portrait photography camera
Sony NEX-3N as a Portrait photography camera
27
has manual focus
no manual mode
can't use external flash
MP count low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
65
focusing manually
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
cannot use external flash
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Street photography with Casio EX-Z35
Street photography with Sony NEX-3N
48
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
77
screen tilts up and down
nice sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
lack of image stabilization
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-Z35 as a Sports photography camera
Sony NEX-3N as a Sports photography camera
17
no shutter priority
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
53
megapixel count decent (16MP)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
good battery life (480 CIPA)
painfully slow continuous shooting (4.0 fps)
lack of image stabilization
no phase detect autofocus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-Z35 Travel photography details
Sony NEX-3N Travel photography details
51
flash built-in
lack of Timelapse recording
MP count low (12 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
wide angle not the best (36mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
70
good battery life (480 CIPA)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
doesn't have Timelapse recording
does not have selfie friendly screen
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-Z35 Landscape photography advice
Sony NEX-3N Landscape photography advice
27
has manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (36mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
small screen (2.5")
no manual mode
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
lack of Timelapse recording
70
focusing manually
swap lenses (Sony E mount)
screen size is good (3 inch)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
good battery life (480 shots)
lack of image stabilization
doesn't have Timelapse recording
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-Z35 Vlogging information
Sony NEX-3N Vlogging information
22
wide angle not the best (36mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.1)
display is not selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
low quality video (640 x 480 resolution)
lack of microphone jack
28
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
does not have selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
doesn't have microphone port
Photography Glossary

Casio EX-Z35 vs Sony NEX-3N Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-Z35 and Sony NEX-3N
 Casio Exilim EX-Z35Sony Alpha NEX-3N
General Information
Make Casio Sony
Model type Casio Exilim EX-Z35 Sony Alpha NEX-3N
Class Ultracompact Entry-Level Mirrorless
Revealed 2010-02-21 2013-02-25
Body design Ultracompact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Chip Exilim Engine 5.0 Bionz
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4000 x 3000 4912 x 3264
Highest native ISO 3200 16000
Minimum native ISO 64 200
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points - 25
Lens
Lens support fixed lens Sony E
Lens zoom range 36-107mm (3.0x) -
Maximal aperture f/3.1-5.6 -
Macro focusing distance 10cm -
Total lenses - 121
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1.5
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Tilting
Screen sizing 2.5 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 230 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4s 30s
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/4000s
Continuous shutter speed - 4.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 3.20 m -
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft -
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Fastest flash sync - 1/160s
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) 1920 x 1080
Highest video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video file format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, AVCHD
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 124g (0.27 lb) 269g (0.59 lb)
Dimensions 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") 110 x 62 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.4")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested 74
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 22.8
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 12.5
DXO Low light rating not tested 1067
Other
Battery life - 480 images
Battery form - Battery Pack
Battery ID NP-82 NPFW50
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) -
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo
Storage slots One One
Launch pricing $99 $399