Casio EX-Z35 vs Sony HX350
96 Imaging
34 Features
14 Overall
26
62 Imaging
45 Features
51 Overall
47
Casio EX-Z35 vs Sony HX350 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
- Announced February 2010
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 3200 (Boost to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1200mm (F2.8-6.3) lens
- 652g - 130 x 93 x 103mm
- Announced December 2016
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-Z35 vs Sony HX350 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Casio EX-Z35 vs Sony HX350, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Casio and Sony. There is a substantial difference between the resolutions of the EX-Z35 (12MP) and HX350 (20MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-Z35 was released 7 years prior to the HX350 and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-Z35 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony HX350 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting straight to a full comparison, here is a short summary of how the EX-Z35 scores vs the HX350 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-Z35 vs Sony HX350 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-Z35 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX350. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z35 Gallery & Sony HX350 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Sony HX350
| EX-Z35 | HX350 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony HX350 over the Casio EX-Z35
| HX350 | EX-Z35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | December 2016 |  | February 2010 | Fresher by 83 months |
| Display type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting display |
| Display size | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 922k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+692k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z35 and Sony HX350
| EX-Z35 | HX350 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Missing Touch display |
Casio EX-Z35 vs Sony HX350 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry your camera frequently, you need to factor its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z35 enjoys physical dimensions of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") and a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Sony HX350 has sizing of 130mm x 93mm x 103mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.1") having a weight of 652 grams (1.44 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-Z35 vs Sony HX350 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are working with at that moment. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the EX-Z35 versus the HX350.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z35 and HX350 is 96 and 62 respectively.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Sony HX350 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be tough to envision the gap between sensor sizing purely by checking specifications. The photograph here will offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z35 and HX350.
To sum up, both the cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same megapixels. You can anticipate the Sony HX350 to give more detail as a result of its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The older EX-Z35 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Sony HX350 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Casio EX-Z35 vs Sony HX350 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX350 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Sony |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX350 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2010-02-21 | 2016-12-20 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | BIONZ X |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 5184 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | - | 12800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 24-1200mm (50.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/2.8-6.3 |
| Macro focusing distance | 10cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen diagonal | 2.5" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 922 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 202 thousand dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.20 m | 8.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Off, auto, fill, slow sync, advanced, rear sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 124 grams (0.27 lb) | 652 grams (1.44 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 130 x 93 x 103mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 photographs |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-82 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC + Memory Stick Pro Duo |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $99 | - |