Casio EX-Z35 vs Sony TX7
96 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
![Casio Exilim EX-Z35 front Casio Exilim EX-Z35 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z35/Casio-EX-Z35-front.jpg)
![Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX7 front Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX7 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/w300/fronton/Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-TX7.jpg)
95 Imaging
33 Features
34 Overall
33
Casio EX-Z35 vs Sony TX7 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
- Released February 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.4" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
- 149g - 98 x 60 x 18mm
- Revealed January 2010
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-Z35 vs Sony TX7 Overview
The following is a thorough overview of the Casio EX-Z35 vs Sony TX7, both Ultracompact cameras by rivals Casio and Sony. The resolution of the EX-Z35 (12MP) and the TX7 (10MP) is pretty close but the EX-Z35 (1/2.3") and TX7 (1/2.4") feature totally different sensor sizes.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
The EX-Z35 was announced 2 months after the TX7 and they are of a similar age. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before delving straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the EX-Z35 scores vs the TX7 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-Z35 vs Sony TX7 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-Z35 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX7. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z35 Gallery & Sony TX7 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Sony TX7
EX-Z35 | TX7 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Sony TX7 over the Casio EX-Z35
TX7 | EX-Z35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 3.5" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+1") |
Screen resolution | 921k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+691k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z35 and Sony TX7
EX-Z35 | TX7 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2010 | ![]() | January 2010 | Same age |
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen |
Casio EX-Z35 vs Sony TX7 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to travel with your camera frequently, you will have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-Z35 has outer measurements of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") having a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Sony TX7 has dimensions of 98mm x 60mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") along with a weight of 149 grams (0.33 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-Z35 vs Sony TX7 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the EX-Z35 and the TX7.
![Casio EX-Z35 vs Sony TX7 size comparison Casio EX-Z35 vs Sony TX7 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z35-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-TX7-size-comparison.jpg)
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z35 and TX7 is 96 and 95 respectively.
![Casio EX-Z35 vs Sony TX7 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-Z35 vs Sony TX7 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z35-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-TX7-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Casio EX-Z35 vs Sony TX7 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its hard to envision the difference in sensor dimensions just by researching a spec sheet. The pic underneath might offer you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z35 and TX7.
Clearly, the two cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The EX-Z35 using its bigger sensor will make achieving shallow DOF easier and the Casio EX-Z35 will render extra detail with its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop pictures a little more aggressively.
![Casio EX-Z35 vs Sony TX7 sensor size comparison Casio EX-Z35 vs Sony TX7 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z35-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-TX7-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Casio EX-Z35 vs Sony TX7 Screen and ViewFinder
![Casio EX-Z35 vs Sony TX7 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-Z35 vs Sony TX7 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z35-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-TX7-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-Z35 vs Sony TX7 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX7 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Sony |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX7 |
Type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Released | 2010-02-21 | 2010-01-07 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.4" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.104 x 4.578mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3456 x 2592 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 125 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/3.5-4.6 |
Macro focusing range | 10cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.5 inch | 3.5 inch |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 2s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1600s |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.20 m | 3.80 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (60, 30fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | AVCHD |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 124 gr (0.27 lb) | 149 gr (0.33 lb) |
Dimensions | 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 98 x 60 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-82 | NP-BN1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, portrait1/ portrait2) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo/ PRO HG-Duo, optional SD, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $99 | $300 |