Casio EX-Z400 vs Casio TRYX
95 Imaging
34 Features
25 Overall
30
99 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31
Casio EX-Z400 vs Casio TRYX Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F2.6-7.0) lens
- 130g - 95 x 60 x 23mm
- Announced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21mm (F2.8) lens
- n/ag - 122 x 58 x 15mm
- Launched January 2011
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-Z400 vs Casio TRYX Overview
Here is a thorough assessment of the Casio EX-Z400 versus Casio TRYX, both Ultracompact digital cameras and they are both created by Casio. The sensor resolution of the EX-Z400 (12MP) and the TRYX (12MP) is pretty well matched and they enjoy the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-Z400 was unveiled 24 months earlier than the TRYX which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Each of the cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before we go in to a detailed comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the EX-Z400 scores vs the TRYX in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-Z400 vs Casio TRYX Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-Z400 and Casio Exilim TRYX. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-Z400 Gallery and Casio TRYX Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z400 over the Casio TRYX
| EX-Z400 | TRYX |
|---|
Reasons to pick Casio TRYX over the Casio EX-Z400
| TRYX | EX-Z400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2011 |  | January 2009 | Fresher by 24 months |
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+231k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z400 and Casio TRYX
| EX-Z400 | TRYX | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen sizing |
| Touch screen |  | Neither includes Touch screen |
Casio EX-Z400 vs Casio TRYX Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry your camera regularly, you will want to think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z400 features outer dimensions of 95mm x 60mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 130 grams (0.29 lbs) and the Casio TRYX has sizing of 122mm x 58mm x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-Z400 versus Casio TRYX in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Here is the front view dimensions comparison of the EX-Z400 compared to the TRYX.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z400 and TRYX is 95 and 99 respectively.
Casio EX-Z400 vs Casio TRYX Sensor Comparison
Often, it's difficult to visualise the difference between sensor sizing purely by looking at specifications. The photograph below might give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z400 and TRYX.
Plainly, both of those cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the same exact megapixels therefore you should expect similar quality of photographs although you will want to consider the production date of the products into consideration. The older EX-Z400 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-Z400 vs Casio TRYX Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Casio EX-Z400 vs Casio TRYX Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z400 | Casio Exilim TRYX | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Casio |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z400 | Casio Exilim TRYX |
| Category | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Announced | 2009-01-08 | 2011-01-05 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Exilim Engine HS |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 21mm (1x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.6-7.0 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focus range | - | 8cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 230k dots | 461k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display technology | - | Super Clear TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 1/2s | 1/8s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1000s | 1/4000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | - | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 130g (0.29 lbs) | - |
| Dimensions | 95 x 60 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 122 x 58 x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-40 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $0 | $689 |