Casio EX-Z400 vs Kodak M320
95 Imaging
34 Features
25 Overall
30
95 Imaging
31 Features
10 Overall
22
Casio EX-Z400 vs Kodak M320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F2.6-7.0) lens
- 130g - 95 x 60 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 34-102mm (F2.8-5.1) lens
- 155g - 97 x 60 x 21mm
- Revealed January 2009
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-Z400 vs Kodak M320 Overview
On this page, we will be analyzing the Casio EX-Z400 vs Kodak M320, both Ultracompact digital cameras by companies Casio and Kodak. There is a substantial difference between the sensor resolutions of the EX-Z400 (12MP) and M320 (9MP) and the EX-Z400 (1/2.3") and M320 (1/2.5") provide different sensor sizes.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-Z400 was launched at a similar time to the M320 which means that they are of a similar age. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before delving right into a thorough comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the EX-Z400 scores vs the M320 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Casio EX-Z400 vs Kodak M320 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z400 & Kodak EasyShare M320. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-Z400 Gallery & Kodak M320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z400 over the Kodak M320
| EX-Z400 | M320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Kodak M320 over the Casio EX-Z400
| M320 | EX-Z400 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-Z400 and Kodak M320
| EX-Z400 | M320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2009 |  | January 2009 | Similar age |
| Manually focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Exact same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-Z400 vs Kodak M320 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry around your camera often, you're going to have to take into account its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z400 comes with external dimensions of 95mm x 60mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 130 grams (0.29 lbs) and the Kodak M320 has sizing of 97mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-Z400 vs Kodak M320 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are using during that time. The following is a front view sizing comparison of the EX-Z400 against the M320.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z400 and M320 is 95 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-Z400 vs Kodak M320 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is difficult to picture the gap between sensor sizes merely by looking at a spec sheet. The pic below might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z400 and M320.
Clearly, each of these cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The EX-Z400 featuring a bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field simpler and the Casio EX-Z400 will resolve extra detail utilizing its extra 3MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs a bit more aggressively.
Casio EX-Z400 vs Kodak M320 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Casio EX-Z400 vs Kodak M320 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z400 | Kodak EasyShare M320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Kodak |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z400 | Kodak EasyShare M320 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2009-01-08 | 2009-01-08 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.5" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 24.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 9 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3472 x 2604 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 25 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 34-102mm (3.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.6-7.0 | f/2.8-5.1 |
| Macro focus range | - | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 6.3 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 1/2 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1000 seconds | 1/1400 seconds |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 3.00 m |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 130g (0.29 lbs) | 155g (0.34 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 95 x 60 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 97 x 60 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-40 | KLIC-7001 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail price | $0 | $39 |