Clicky

Casio EX-Z400 vs Kodak M575

Portability
95
Imaging
34
Features
25
Overall
30
Casio Exilim EX-Z400 front
 
Kodak EasyShare M575 front
Portability
95
Imaging
36
Features
24
Overall
31

Casio EX-Z400 vs Kodak M575 Key Specs

Casio EX-Z400
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-112mm (F2.6-7.0) lens
  • 130g - 95 x 60 x 23mm
  • Announced January 2009
Kodak M575
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1000
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-140mm (F) lens
  • 152g - 99 x 58 x 19mm
  • Released January 2010
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Casio EX-Z400 vs Kodak M575 Overview

Its time to look a little more closely at the Casio EX-Z400 vs Kodak M575, both Ultracompact digital cameras by brands Casio and Kodak. The image resolution of the EX-Z400 (12MP) and the M575 (14MP) is fairly similar and both cameras posses the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The EX-Z400 was announced 12 months earlier than the M575 and they are of a similar generation. Both the cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).

Before delving straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick summation of how the EX-Z400 matches up against the M575 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z400 over the Kodak M575

 EX-Z400 M575 

Reasons to pick Kodak M575 over the Casio EX-Z400

 M575 EX-Z400 
ReleasedJanuary 2010January 2009More modern by 12 months

Common features in the Casio EX-Z400 and Kodak M575

 EX-Z400 M575 
Focus manually Lack of manual focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display sizing
Display resolution230k230kSame display resolution
Selfie screen Neither features selfie screen
Touch friendly display Missing Touch friendly display

Casio EX-Z400 vs Kodak M575 Physical Comparison

When you are aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you'll have to consider its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-Z400 enjoys exterior dimensions of 95mm x 60mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 130 grams (0.29 lbs) while the Kodak M575 has measurements of 99mm x 58mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") and a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs).

Take a look at the Casio EX-Z400 vs Kodak M575 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilising during that time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-Z400 vs the M575.

Casio EX-Z400 vs Kodak M575 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z400 and M575 is 95 and 95 respectively.

Casio EX-Z400 vs Kodak M575 top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-Z400 vs Kodak M575 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, its difficult to visualise the gap between sensor sizes only by going over specs. The image below will offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z400 and M575.

As you can plainly see, each of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same resolution. You should anticipate the Kodak M575 to offer extra detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z400 is going to be behind in sensor technology.

Casio EX-Z400 vs Kodak M575 sensor size comparison

Casio EX-Z400 vs Kodak M575 Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-Z400 vs Kodak M575 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Casio EX-Z400
Portrait photography with Kodak M575
20
no manual focus
no manual control
no external flash support
low MP (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
28
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
no manual exposure
external flash not possible
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Casio EX-Z400 Street photography features
Kodak M575 Street photography features
56
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen does not articulate
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
48
screen is fixed
lack of image stabilization
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no RAW format
heavier than competition (152g)
max ISO too low (1,000)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-Z400 Sports photography details
Kodak M575 Sports photography details
25
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
low maximum shutter speed (1/1,000 seconds)
no shutter priority mode
low MP (12 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
26
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
max shutter speed is low (1/1,400s)
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
small sensor size (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-Z400 as a Travel photography camera
Kodak M575 as a Travel photography camera
58
flash built-in
relatively wide (28mm)
no Timelapse mode
low MP (12 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f2.6)
68
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
fairly wide (28mm)
very good max aperture (f)
no Time Lapse mode
heavier than competition (152g)
display isn't selfie friendly
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-Z400 Landscape photography highlights
Kodak M575 Landscape photography highlights
36
relatively wide (28mm)
nice screen size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.6)
no manual control
low MP (12 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
no Timelapse mode
40
fairly wide (28mm)
very good max aperture (f)
nice screen size (3")
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
cannot change lens (fixed lens mount)
no manual exposure
lack of image stabilization
small sensor size (1/2.3")
max ISO too low (1,000)
no RAW format
no Time Lapse mode
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Casio EX-Z400
Vlogging with Kodak M575
29
relatively wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish max aperture (f2.6)
display is not selfie friendly
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
no microphone socket
28
fairly wide (28mm)
very good max aperture (f)
display isn't selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
low res video (1280 x 720 pixels)
no external mic port
heavier than competition (152g)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Casio EX-Z400 vs Kodak M575 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-Z400 and Kodak M575
 Casio Exilim EX-Z400Kodak EasyShare M575
General Information
Manufacturer Casio Kodak
Model Casio Exilim EX-Z400 Kodak EasyShare M575
Class Ultracompact Ultracompact
Announced 2009-01-08 2010-01-05
Body design Ultracompact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 14 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4000 x 3000 4288 x 3216
Highest native ISO 1600 1000
Min native ISO 100 80
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-112mm (4.0x) 28-140mm (5.0x)
Highest aperture f/2.6-7.0 -
Macro focus distance - 10cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 3 inches 3 inches
Display resolution 230 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 1/2s 8s
Highest shutter speed 1/1000s 1/1400s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range - 3.50 m
Flash options - Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off
External flash
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video file format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB none USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 130 gr (0.29 pounds) 152 gr (0.34 pounds)
Physical dimensions 95 x 60 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") 99 x 58 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model NP-40 KLIC-7006
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible SD/SDHC card, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Pricing at launch $0 $139