Casio EX-Z400 vs Olympus TG-870
95 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31
91 Imaging
41 Features
46 Overall
43
Casio EX-Z400 vs Olympus TG-870 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F2.6-7.0) lens
- 130g - 95 x 60 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400 (Raise to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 21-105mm (F3.5-5.7) lens
- 221g - 113 x 64 x 28mm
- Announced January 2016
- Replaced the Olympus TG-860
Photography Glossary Casio EX-Z400 vs Olympus TG-870 Overview
In this article, we will be contrasting the Casio EX-Z400 vs Olympus TG-870, both Ultracompact cameras by rivals Casio and Olympus. There is a noticeable difference among the image resolutions of the EX-Z400 (12MP) and TG-870 (16MP) but they come with the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-Z400 was announced 8 years earlier than the TG-870 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Ultracompact).
Before we go in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the EX-Z400 matches up vs the TG-870 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-Z400 vs Olympus TG-870 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-Z400 & Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z400 Gallery & Olympus TG-870 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z400 over the Olympus TG-870
| EX-Z400 | TG-870 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-870 over the Casio EX-Z400
| TG-870 | EX-Z400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2016 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 85 months |
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen resolution | 921k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+691k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z400 and Olympus TG-870
| EX-Z400 | TG-870 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-Z400 vs Olympus TG-870 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry around your camera regularly, you will want to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-Z400 has got exterior measurements of 95mm x 60mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 130 grams (0.29 lbs) while the Olympus TG-870 has dimensions of 113mm x 64mm x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-Z400 vs Olympus TG-870 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have at that moment. The following is the front view sizing comparison of the EX-Z400 compared to the TG-870.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z400 and TG-870 is 95 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-Z400 vs Olympus TG-870 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its tough to picture the gap in sensor sizes purely by going through specs. The picture below will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z400 and TG-870.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different resolution. You can expect the Olympus TG-870 to show more detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures a little more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z400 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-Z400 vs Olympus TG-870 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-Z400 vs Olympus TG-870 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z400 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z400 | Olympus Stylus Tough TG-870 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2009-01-08 | 2016-01-06 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | TruePic VII |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Max boosted ISO | - | 12800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 21-105mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.6-7.0 | f/3.5-5.7 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 1/2 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 7.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.00 m (at ISO 1600) |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, off, LED illuminator |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p), 1280 x 720 (60p), 640 x 480 (60p) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 130g (0.29 pounds) | 221g (0.49 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 95 x 60 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 113 x 64 x 28mm (4.4" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 shots |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-40 | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail price | $0 | $280 |
