Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh CX3
95 Imaging
34 Features
25 Overall
30
92 Imaging
33 Features
35 Overall
33
Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh CX3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F2.6-7.0) lens
- 130g - 95 x 60 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 206g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Revealed June 2010
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh CX3 Overview
Here, we will be analyzing the Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh CX3, one is a Ultracompact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Casio and Ricoh. The image resolution of the EX-Z400 (12MP) and the CX3 (10MP) is relatively similar and both cameras provide the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-Z400 was unveiled 17 months earlier than the CX3 which makes them a generation away from one another. Both cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-Z400 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh CX3 being a Compact camera.
Before going right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief view of how the EX-Z400 grades versus the CX3 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh CX3 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z400 and Ricoh CX3. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z400 Gallery and Ricoh CX3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z400 over the Ricoh CX3
| EX-Z400 | CX3 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX3 over the Casio EX-Z400
| CX3 | EX-Z400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | June 2010 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 17 months |
| Manual focus |  | More accurate focus | ||
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z400 and Ricoh CX3
| EX-Z400 | CX3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh CX3 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you have to consider its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-Z400 comes with physical measurements of 95mm x 60mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 130 grams (0.29 lbs) while the Ricoh CX3 has proportions of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
See the Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh CX3 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at that time. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-Z400 against the CX3.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z400 and CX3 is 95 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh CX3 Sensor Comparison
Typically, its tough to visualize the difference between sensor sizes merely by reviewing a spec sheet. The pic underneath might provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-Z400 and CX3.
As you can see, the 2 cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different resolution. You should count on the Casio EX-Z400 to offer you greater detail having an extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures way more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z400 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh CX3 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh CX3 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z400 | Ricoh CX3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z400 | Ricoh CX3 |
| Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2009-01-08 | 2010-06-16 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.6-7.0 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 1/2s | 8s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1000s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.00 m |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 130g (0.29 pounds) | 206g (0.45 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 95 x 60 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-40 | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $0 | $329 |