Clicky

Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh GR

Portability
95
Imaging
34
Features
25
Overall
30
Casio Exilim EX-Z400 front
 
Ricoh GR front
Portability
90
Imaging
57
Features
54
Overall
55

Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh GR Key Specs

Casio EX-Z400
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-112mm (F2.6-7.0) lens
  • 130g - 95 x 60 x 23mm
  • Launched January 2009
Ricoh GR
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 25600
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28mm (F2.8) lens
  • 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
  • Revealed April 2013
  • Renewed by Ricoh GR II
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh GR Overview

Lets look more in depth at the Casio EX-Z400 versus Ricoh GR, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Casio and Ricoh. There exists a sizable gap among the sensor resolutions of the EX-Z400 (12MP) and GR (16MP) and the EX-Z400 (1/2.3") and GR (APS-C) boast different sensor measurements.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The EX-Z400 was unveiled 5 years earlier than the GR which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z400 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh GR being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before going right into a more detailed comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the EX-Z400 matches up versus the GR in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

				

Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z400 over the Ricoh GR

 EX-Z400 GR 

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Casio EX-Z400

 GR EX-Z400 
RevealedApril 2013January 2009More modern by 52 months
Manually focus Very exact focus
Display resolution1230k230kClearer display (+1000k dot)

Common features in the Casio EX-Z400 and Ricoh GR

 EX-Z400 GR 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display measurements
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen
Touch display Neither has Touch display

Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh GR Physical Comparison

For anyone who is going to carry around your camera often, you are going to need to think about its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-Z400 has physical measurements of 95mm x 60mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 130 grams (0.29 lbs) while the Ricoh GR has proportions of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") along with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).

Take a look at the Casio EX-Z400 versus Ricoh GR in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilizing at that time. The following is a front view scale comparison of the EX-Z400 against the GR.

Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh GR size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z400 and GR is 95 and 90 respectively.

Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh GR top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh GR Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it is very hard to imagine the difference in sensor sizes just by viewing specifications. The pic here will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z400 and GR.

Plainly, each of these cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The EX-Z400 with its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF trickier and the Ricoh GR will render more detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z400 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.

Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh GR sensor size comparison

Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh GR Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh GR Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-Z400 Portrait photography info
Ricoh GR Portrait photography info
20
no manual focus
manual exposure not available
cannot use external flash
low MP (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
74
focusing manually
high flash sync (1/4,000 seconds)
MP count good (16 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Casio EX-Z400 Street photography information
Ricoh GR Street photography information
56
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen does not articulate
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
74
nice sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
lighter than others (245g)
great high ISO (25,600)
no moving screen
no image stabilization
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-Z400 as a Sports photography camera
Ricoh GR as a Sports photography camera
25
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
low max shutter speed (1/1,000 seconds)
no shutter priority
low MP (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no phase detect autofocus
45
MP count good (16MP)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
can't change focal length (28mm)
continuous shooting slow (4.0 frames/s)
no image stabilization
does not have phase detect autofocus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-Z400 Travel photography advice
Ricoh GR Travel photography advice
58
flash built-in
rather wide (28mm)
lack of Timelapse function
low MP (12MP)
does not have selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f2.6)
71
lighter than others (245 grams)
MP count good (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-Z400 Landscape photography information
Ricoh GR Landscape photography information
36
rather wide (28mm)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no manual focus
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.6)
manual exposure not available
low MP (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW support
lack of Timelapse function
61
focusing manually
screen size is good (3")
MP count good (16 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
great high ISO (25,600)
saves RAW formats
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (28mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
no image stabilization
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-Z400 Vlogging highlights
Ricoh GR Vlogging highlights
29
rather wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
slow maximum aperture (f2.6)
does not have selfie friendly screen
low res video (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of microphone port
30
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than others (245g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
doesn't have a selfie friendly display
no image stabilization
missing microphone support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh GR Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-Z400 and Ricoh GR
 Casio Exilim EX-Z400Ricoh GR
General Information
Brand Name Casio Ricoh
Model type Casio Exilim EX-Z400 Ricoh GR
Category Ultracompact Large Sensor Compact
Launched 2009-01-08 2013-04-17
Physical type Ultracompact Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.7 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 372.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 16 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Highest resolution 4000 x 3000 4928 x 3264
Highest native ISO 1600 25600
Minimum native ISO 100 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-112mm (4.0x) 28mm (1x)
Maximum aperture f/2.6-7.0 f/2.8
Crop factor 5.8 1.5
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of display 230k dots 1,230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Display tech - TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Optical (optional)
Features
Slowest shutter speed 1/2 secs 300 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/1000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shooting rate - 4.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance - 5.40 m (at ISO 100)
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize - 1/4000 secs
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video format Motion JPEG MPEG-4
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB none USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 130g (0.29 lbs) 245g (0.54 lbs)
Physical dimensions 95 x 60 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 78
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 23.6
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 13.5
DXO Low light rating not tested 972
Other
Battery life - 290 pictures
Form of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID NP-40 DB65
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) Yes
Time lapse recording
Storage type SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible SD, SDHC, SDXC
Card slots Single Single
Price at launch $0 $971