Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh GR
95 Imaging
34 Features
25 Overall
30


90 Imaging
57 Features
54 Overall
55
Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh GR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F2.6-7.0) lens
- 130g - 95 x 60 x 23mm
- Launched January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8) lens
- 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
- Revealed April 2013
- Renewed by Ricoh GR II

Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh GR Overview
Lets look more in depth at the Casio EX-Z400 versus Ricoh GR, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Casio and Ricoh. There exists a sizable gap among the sensor resolutions of the EX-Z400 (12MP) and GR (16MP) and the EX-Z400 (1/2.3") and GR (APS-C) boast different sensor measurements.

The EX-Z400 was unveiled 5 years earlier than the GR which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z400 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh GR being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before going right into a more detailed comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the EX-Z400 matches up versus the GR in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh GR Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-Z400 & Ricoh GR. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z400 Gallery & Ricoh GR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z400 over the Ricoh GR
EX-Z400 | GR |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Casio EX-Z400
GR | EX-Z400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | April 2013 | ![]() | January 2009 | More modern by 52 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Display resolution | 1230k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+1000k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z400 and Ricoh GR
EX-Z400 | GR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither has Touch display |
Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh GR Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry around your camera often, you are going to need to think about its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-Z400 has physical measurements of 95mm x 60mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 130 grams (0.29 lbs) while the Ricoh GR has proportions of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") along with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-Z400 versus Ricoh GR in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilizing at that time. The following is a front view scale comparison of the EX-Z400 against the GR.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z400 and GR is 95 and 90 respectively.

Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh GR Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very hard to imagine the difference in sensor sizes just by viewing specifications. The pic here will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z400 and GR.
Plainly, each of these cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The EX-Z400 with its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF trickier and the Ricoh GR will render more detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z400 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.

Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh GR Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh GR Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z400 | Ricoh GR | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Ricoh |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z400 | Ricoh GR |
Category | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2009-01-08 | 2013-04-17 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 372.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4928 x 3264 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.6-7.0 | f/2.8 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 230k dots | 1,230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 1/2 secs | 300 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/1000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 4.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 5.40 m (at ISO 100) |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/4000 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 130g (0.29 lbs) | 245g (0.54 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 95 x 60 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 78 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.6 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.5 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 972 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 290 pictures |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-40 | DB65 |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD, SDHC, SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $0 | $971 |