Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV
95 Imaging
34 Features
25 Overall
30


92 Imaging
34 Features
47 Overall
39
Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F2.6-7.0) lens
- 130g - 95 x 60 x 23mm
- Released January 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28mm (F1.9) lens
- 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
- Introduced September 2011
- Replaced the Ricoh GR Digital III

Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Overview
Below is a thorough comparison of the Casio EX-Z400 versus Ricoh GR Digital IV, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Casio and Ricoh. The image resolution of the EX-Z400 (12MP) and the GR Digital IV (10MP) is relatively well matched but the EX-Z400 (1/2.3") and GR Digital IV (1/1.7") posses totally different sensor size.

The EX-Z400 was introduced 3 years prior to the GR Digital IV and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-Z400 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh GR Digital IV being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight to a detailed comparison, here is a brief summation of how the EX-Z400 matches up against the GR Digital IV with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z400 & Ricoh GR Digital IV. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z400 Gallery & Ricoh GR Digital IV Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z400 over the Ricoh GR Digital IV
EX-Z400 | GR Digital IV |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Casio EX-Z400
GR Digital IV | EX-Z400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2011 | ![]() | January 2009 | More recent by 32 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial precise focus | ||
Screen resolution | 1230k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+1000k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z400 and Ricoh GR Digital IV
EX-Z400 | GR Digital IV | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to lug around your camera often, you have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-Z400 enjoys physical measurements of 95mm x 60mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 130 grams (0.29 lbs) and the Ricoh GR Digital IV has proportions of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
See the Casio EX-Z400 versus Ricoh GR Digital IV in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen at that time. Following is a front view measurements comparison of the EX-Z400 and the GR Digital IV.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z400 and GR Digital IV is 95 and 92 respectively.

Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be tough to visualise the gap between sensor measurements only by reading through specs. The visual underneath might offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z400 and GR Digital IV.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The EX-Z400 having a tinier sensor will make getting shallow depth of field more challenging and the Casio EX-Z400 will resolve more detail using its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots way more aggressively. The older EX-Z400 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.

Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z400 | Ricoh GR Digital IV | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Ricoh |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z400 | Ricoh GR Digital IV |
Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2009-01-08 | 2011-09-15 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.6-7.0 | f/1.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 1,230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 1/2 seconds | 1 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/1000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 3.00 m |
Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 130 gr (0.29 pounds) | 190 gr (0.42 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 95 x 60 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 390 photos |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-40 | DB65 |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $0 | $599 |