Clicky

Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV

Portability
95
Imaging
34
Features
25
Overall
30
Casio Exilim EX-Z400 front
 
Ricoh GR Digital IV front
Portability
92
Imaging
34
Features
47
Overall
39

Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Key Specs

Casio EX-Z400
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-112mm (F2.6-7.0) lens
  • 130g - 95 x 60 x 23mm
  • Released January 2009
Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28mm (F1.9) lens
  • 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
  • Introduced September 2011
  • Replaced the Ricoh GR Digital III
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Overview

Below is a thorough comparison of the Casio EX-Z400 versus Ricoh GR Digital IV, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Casio and Ricoh. The image resolution of the EX-Z400 (12MP) and the GR Digital IV (10MP) is relatively well matched but the EX-Z400 (1/2.3") and GR Digital IV (1/1.7") posses totally different sensor size.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The EX-Z400 was introduced 3 years prior to the GR Digital IV and that is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-Z400 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh GR Digital IV being a Compact camera.

Before getting straight to a detailed comparison, here is a brief summation of how the EX-Z400 matches up against the GR Digital IV with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

        

Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z400 over the Ricoh GR Digital IV

 EX-Z400 GR Digital IV 

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Casio EX-Z400

 GR Digital IV EX-Z400 
IntroducedSeptember 2011January 2009More recent by 32 months
Focus manually Dial precise focus
Screen resolution1230k230kSharper screen (+1000k dot)

Common features in the Casio EX-Z400 and Ricoh GR Digital IV

 EX-Z400 GR Digital IV 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen size3"3"Same screen size
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Absent Touch friendly screen

Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Physical Comparison

If you are aiming to lug around your camera often, you have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-Z400 enjoys physical measurements of 95mm x 60mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 130 grams (0.29 lbs) and the Ricoh GR Digital IV has proportions of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).

See the Casio EX-Z400 versus Ricoh GR Digital IV in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen at that time. Following is a front view measurements comparison of the EX-Z400 and the GR Digital IV.

Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z400 and GR Digital IV is 95 and 92 respectively.

Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it can be tough to visualise the gap between sensor measurements only by reading through specs. The visual underneath might offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z400 and GR Digital IV.

As you can plainly see, both the cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The EX-Z400 having a tinier sensor will make getting shallow depth of field more challenging and the Casio EX-Z400 will resolve more detail using its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots way more aggressively. The older EX-Z400 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.

Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV sensor size comparison

Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Casio EX-Z400
Portrait photography with Ricoh GR Digital IV
20
no manual focus
no manual control
cannot use external flash
low MP (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
40
you can focus manually
saves RAW formats
MP count low (10MP)
sensor is tiny (1/1.7")
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Casio EX-Z400 Street photography advice
Ricoh GR Digital IV Street photography advice
56
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen does not articulate
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
64
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW formats
fixed screen
sensor is tiny (1/1.7")
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-Z400 Sports photography details
Ricoh GR Digital IV Sports photography details
25
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
max shutter speed is low (1/1,000s)
no shutter priority
low MP (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
33
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
better than average battery (390 per charge)
fixed focal length (28mm)
MP count low (10MP)
sensor is tiny (1/1.7")
does not have phase detect autofocus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-Z400 Travel photography details
Ricoh GR Digital IV Travel photography details
58
built-in flash
pretty wide (28mm)
lack of Timelapse function
low MP (12 megapixels)
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.6)
67
better than average battery (390 CIPA)
built-in flash
fast max aperture (f1.9)
MP count low (10MP)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-Z400 Landscape photography highlights
Ricoh GR Digital IV Landscape photography highlights
36
pretty wide (28mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.6)
no manual control
low MP (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW support
lack of Timelapse function
52
you can focus manually
fast max aperture (f1.9)
screen size is decent (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW formats
better than average battery (390 CIPA)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
fixed focal length (28mm)
MP count low (10 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/1.7")
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-Z400 Vlogging highlights
Ricoh GR Digital IV Vlogging highlights
29
pretty wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.6)
screen is not selfie friendly
video quality not great (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of microphone support
29
fast max aperture (f1.9)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
video res low (640 x 480 resolution)
does not have external microphone socket
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-Z400 and Ricoh GR Digital IV
 Casio Exilim EX-Z400Ricoh GR Digital IV
General Information
Manufacturer Casio Ricoh
Model type Casio Exilim EX-Z400 Ricoh GR Digital IV
Class Ultracompact Small Sensor Compact
Released 2009-01-08 2011-09-15
Physical type Ultracompact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/1.7"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 10 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Full resolution 4000 x 3000 3648 x 2736
Max native ISO 1600 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-112mm (4.0x) 28mm (1x)
Maximal aperture f/2.6-7.0 f/1.9
Macro focusing distance - 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 4.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 230 thousand dots 1,230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Optical (optional)
Features
Slowest shutter speed 1/2 seconds 1 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/1000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance - 3.00 m
Flash settings - Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB none USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 130 gr (0.29 pounds) 190 gr (0.42 pounds)
Physical dimensions 95 x 60 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 390 photos
Battery type - Battery Pack
Battery ID NP-40 DB65
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage type SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible SD/SDHC, Internal
Card slots One One
Pricing at launch $0 $599