Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh GR III
95 Imaging
34 Features
25 Overall
30
90 Imaging
68 Features
62 Overall
65
Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh GR III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F2.6-7.0) lens
- 130g - 95 x 60 x 23mm
- Launched January 2009
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 102400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8-16) lens
- 257g - 109 x 62 x 33mm
- Launched September 2018
- Replaced the Ricoh GR III
- Successor is Ricoh GR III
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh GR III Overview
Here, we will be analyzing the Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh GR III, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Casio and Ricoh. There exists a significant gap among the sensor resolutions of the EX-Z400 (12MP) and GR III (24MP) and the EX-Z400 (1/2.3") and GR III (APS-C) offer different sensor sizing.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-Z400 was manufactured 10 years before the GR III and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-Z400 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh GR III being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before delving right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise summation of how the EX-Z400 matches up vs the GR III in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh GR III Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z400 and Ricoh GR III. The entire galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z400 Gallery and Ricoh GR III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z400 over the Ricoh GR III
| EX-Z400 | GR III |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR III over the Casio EX-Z400
| GR III | EX-Z400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | September 2018 | January 2009 | More recent by 118 months | |
| Manual focus | More accurate focusing | |||
| Screen resolution | 1037k | 230k | Crisper screen (+807k dot) | |
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z400 and Ricoh GR III
| EX-Z400 | GR III | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen measurement | |
| Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen |
Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh GR III Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to lug around your camera, you will want to factor in its weight and size. The Casio EX-Z400 has got outer measurements of 95mm x 60mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 130 grams (0.29 lbs) and the Ricoh GR III has specifications of 109mm x 62mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 257 grams (0.57 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh GR III in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you select at the time. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-Z400 vs the GR III.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z400 and GR III is 95 and 90 respectively.
Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh GR III Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very hard to visualize the difference in sensor measurements only by viewing specifications. The graphic below might offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-Z400 and GR III.
To sum up, the 2 cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The EX-Z400 due to its smaller sensor is going to make getting bokeh more difficult and the Ricoh GR III will provide you with extra detail due to its extra 12MP. Higher resolution will help you crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The older EX-Z400 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh GR III Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh GR III Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z400 | Ricoh GR III | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z400 | Ricoh GR III |
| Category | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2009-01-08 | 2018-09-25 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 24 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1 and 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 6000 x 4000 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 102400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.6-7.0 | f/2.8-16 |
| Macro focus range | - | 6cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 230k dots | 1,037k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 1/2s | 30s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1000s | 1/4000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | - | Auto, Flash On, Flash On+Red-eye, Slow-speed Sync, Slow Sync+Red-eye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | Yes |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 130g (0.29 lb) | 257g (0.57 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 95 x 60 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 109 x 62 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-40 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | Internal, SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I supported) |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail price | $0 | $900 |