Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
95 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31
77 Imaging
52 Features
31 Overall
43
Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F2.6-7.0) lens
- 130g - 95 x 60 x 23mm
- Launched January 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Launched November 2009
Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Overview
Here, we will be matching up the Casio EX-Z400 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by competitors Casio and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the EX-Z400 (12MP) and the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) is pretty similar but the EX-Z400 (1/2.3") and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) posses different sensor sizing.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-Z400 was announced 10 months prior to the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro so they are both of a similar age. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-Z400 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go into a detailed comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the EX-Z400 scores vs the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-Z400 & Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z400 Gallery & Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z400 over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
EX-Z400 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Casio EX-Z400
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | EX-Z400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | November 2009 | January 2009 | Fresher by 10 months | |
Manual focus | Very accurate focus | |||
Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z400 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
EX-Z400 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen measurement | |
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry your camera often, you are going to need to consider its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z400 comes with outside measurements of 95mm x 60mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 130 grams (0.29 lbs) and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has sizing of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") and a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-Z400 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are working with during that time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the EX-Z400 and the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z400 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is 95 and 77 respectively.
Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very tough to imagine the contrast between sensor sizing only by going over a spec sheet. The photograph here should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z400 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
As you can see, each of the cameras feature the identical megapixel count albeit different sensor sizing. The EX-Z400 features the tinier sensor which will make obtaining shallow depth of field more challenging. The older EX-Z400 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z400 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Ricoh |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z400 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro |
Category | Ultracompact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Launched | 2009-01-08 | 2009-11-10 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | GR engine III |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 2848 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 50mm (1x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.6-7.0 | f/2.5 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1/2s | 180s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1000s | 1/3200s |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 3.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 3.00 m |
Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 130g (0.29 lbs) | 453g (1.00 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 95 x 60 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 320 photographs |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-40 | - |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $0 | $566 |