Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
95 Imaging
34 Features
25 Overall
30


69 Imaging
56 Features
45 Overall
51
Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F2.6-7.0) lens
- 130g - 95 x 60 x 23mm
- Released January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-85mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 550g - 114 x 75 x 93mm
- Announced February 2012

Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Overview
On this page, we are contrasting the Casio EX-Z400 and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Casio and Ricoh. There exists a crucial gap among the image resolutions of the EX-Z400 (12MP) and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (16MP) and the EX-Z400 (1/2.3") and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (APS-C) posses totally different sensor measurements.

The EX-Z400 was released 4 years earlier than the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z400 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the EX-Z400 scores against the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-Z400 and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z400 Gallery and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z400 over the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
EX-Z400 | GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 over the Casio EX-Z400
GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | EX-Z400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2012 | ![]() | January 2009 | More modern by 37 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z400 and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
EX-Z400 | GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Lack of Touch display |
Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry around your camera, you will need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-Z400 features outside dimensions of 95mm x 60mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 130 grams (0.29 lbs) and the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 has dimensions of 114mm x 75mm x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") having a weight of 550 grams (1.21 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-Z400 and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are using during that time. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-Z400 and the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z400 and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 is 95 and 69 respectively.

Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's tough to visualise the difference in sensor sizes only by seeing specifications. The image below will offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z400 and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5.
Plainly, both of the cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The EX-Z400 because of its smaller sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field more difficult and the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 will show extra detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop pics a bit more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z400 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.

Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z400 | Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Ricoh |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z400 | Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 |
Type | Ultracompact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Released | 2009-01-08 | 2012-02-02 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4928 x 3264 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 24-85mm (3.5x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.6-7.0 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display tech | - | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 1/2 secs | 180 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/1000 secs | 1/3200 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 130 gr (0.29 lbs) | 550 gr (1.21 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 95 x 60 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 114 x 75 x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 400 shots |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-40 | DB-90 |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail price | $0 | $871 |