Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC
95 Imaging
34 Features
25 Overall
30


85 Imaging
33 Features
48 Overall
39
Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F2.6-7.0) lens
- 130g - 95 x 60 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 367g - 114 x 58 x 50mm
- Launched August 2010

Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Overview
Here is a thorough overview of the Casio EX-Z400 versus Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC, one being a Ultracompact and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Casio and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the EX-Z400 (12MP) and the GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC (10MP) is very close and they feature the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").

The EX-Z400 was manufactured 19 months prior to the GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC making the cameras a generation apart from each other. The two cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-Z400 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go straight into a full comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the EX-Z400 scores against the GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-Z400 and Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z400 Gallery and Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z400 over the Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC
EX-Z400 | GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC over the Casio EX-Z400
GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC | EX-Z400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2010 | ![]() | January 2009 | Fresher by 19 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focusing | ||
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z400 and Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC
EX-Z400 | GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to carry your camera, you will have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-Z400 features physical dimensions of 95mm x 60mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 130 grams (0.29 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC has measurements of 114mm x 58mm x 50mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 2.0") having a weight of 367 grams (0.81 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-Z400 versus Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are working with at the time. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the EX-Z400 against the GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z400 and GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC is 95 and 85 respectively.

Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Sensor Comparison
Usually, its hard to see the gap in sensor sizing merely by viewing specs. The graphic below will offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z400 and GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC.
All in all, each of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but not the same resolution. You should expect to see the Casio EX-Z400 to result in extra detail due to its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will let you crop pics a little more aggressively. The older EX-Z400 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.

Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z400 | Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Ricoh |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z400 | Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC |
Category | Ultracompact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2009-01-08 | 2010-08-06 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
Max aperture | f/2.6-7.0 | f/3.5-5.6 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 1/2s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/1000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 5.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 4.50 m |
Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 130 grams (0.29 pounds) | 367 grams (0.81 pounds) |
Dimensions | 95 x 60 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 114 x 58 x 50mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 2.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 440 photos |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-40 | - |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $0 | $147 |