Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
95 Imaging
34 Features
25 Overall
30
85 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38
Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F2.6-7.0) lens
- 130g - 95 x 60 x 23mm
- Launched January 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
- 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
- Launched March 2010
Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Overview
Lets look a little more in depth at the Casio EX-Z400 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Casio and Ricoh. The image resolution of the EX-Z400 (12MP) and the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) is fairly close but the EX-Z400 (1/2.3") and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") use different sensor sizing.
Photography GlossaryThe EX-Z400 was announced 14 months before the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC making the cameras a generation away from one another. Both cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-Z400 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving through a in depth comparison, below is a short highlight of how the EX-Z400 matches up against the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-Z400 & Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-Z400 Gallery & Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z400 over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
EX-Z400 | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Casio EX-Z400
GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | EX-Z400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | March 2010 | January 2009 | More modern by 14 months | |
Manual focus | More exact focus | |||
Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z400 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
EX-Z400 | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display measurement | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Absent Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you should factor in its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-Z400 comes with outer dimensions of 95mm x 60mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 130 grams (0.29 lbs) and the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC has dimensions of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") along with a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-Z400 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you choose at that time. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the EX-Z400 and the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z400 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC is 95 and 85 respectively.
Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be difficult to imagine the gap in sensor sizes purely by researching specs. The image here might give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z400 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The EX-Z400 with its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF trickier and the Casio EX-Z400 will render greater detail with its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics a little more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z400 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z400 | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Ricoh |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z400 | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC |
Class | Ultracompact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Launched | 2009-01-08 | 2010-03-18 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 24-72mm (3.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.6-7.0 | f/2.5-4.4 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 1/2 seconds | 180 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/1000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 4.50 m |
Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 130g (0.29 lb) | 355g (0.78 lb) |
Dimensions | 95 x 60 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 410 photos |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-40 | - |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $0 | $349 |