Clicky

Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

Portability
95
Imaging
34
Features
25
Overall
30
Casio Exilim EX-Z400 front
 
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC front
Portability
85
Imaging
34
Features
44
Overall
38

Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Key Specs

Casio EX-Z400
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28-112mm (F2.6-7.0) lens
  • 130g - 95 x 60 x 23mm
  • Launched January 2009
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
  • 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
  • Launched March 2010
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Overview

Lets look a little more in depth at the Casio EX-Z400 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Casio and Ricoh. The image resolution of the EX-Z400 (12MP) and the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) is fairly close but the EX-Z400 (1/2.3") and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") use different sensor sizing.

Photography Glossary

The EX-Z400 was announced 14 months before the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC making the cameras a generation away from one another. Both cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-Z400 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before diving through a in depth comparison, below is a short highlight of how the EX-Z400 matches up against the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z400 over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

 EX-Z400 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC 

Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Casio EX-Z400

 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC EX-Z400 
LaunchedMarch 2010January 2009More modern by 14 months
Manual focus More exact focus
Display resolution920k230kSharper display (+690k dot)

Common features in the Casio EX-Z400 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

 EX-Z400 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display sizing3"3"Equivalent display measurement
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch friendly display Absent Touch friendly display

Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Physical Comparison

When you are aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you should factor in its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-Z400 comes with outer dimensions of 95mm x 60mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") and a weight of 130 grams (0.29 lbs) and the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC has dimensions of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") along with a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).

Check the Casio EX-Z400 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you choose at that time. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the EX-Z400 and the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.

Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z400 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC is 95 and 85 respectively.

Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sensor Comparison

Normally, it can be difficult to imagine the gap in sensor sizes purely by researching specs. The image here might give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z400 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.

As you can plainly see, both the cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The EX-Z400 with its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF trickier and the Casio EX-Z400 will render greater detail with its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics a little more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z400 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.

Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC sensor size comparison

Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Casio EX-Z400
Portrait photography with Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
20
manual focus not available
manual exposure not possible
external flash not possible
low resolution (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
36
has manual focus
delivers RAW files
does not have liveview
low megapixels (10MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/1.7")
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Casio EX-Z400 Street photography info
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Street photography info
56
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no moving screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
65
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW files
lighter than competitors (355g)
fixed screen
sensor size is tiny (1/1.7")
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-Z400 Sports photography info
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sports photography info
25
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
low max shutter speed (1/1,000 seconds)
lack of shutter priority mode
low resolution (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
25
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
does not have liveview
max frames per second low (2.0 fps)
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/1.7")
has no phase detect autofocus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-Z400 as a Travel photography camera
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC as a Travel photography camera
58
has built in flash
quite wide (28mm)
lack of Timelapse function
low resolution (12MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.6)
60
lighter than competitors (355 grams)
flash built-in
pretty wide (24mm)
low megapixels (10MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f2.5)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-Z400 Landscape photography advice
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Landscape photography advice
36
quite wide (28mm)
screen size is good (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
manual focus not available
cannot change lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.6)
manual exposure not possible
low resolution (12MP)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
lack of Timelapse function
47
has manual focus
pretty wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW files
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.5)
does not have liveview
low megapixels (10 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/1.7")
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-Z400 as a Vlogging camera
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC as a Vlogging camera
29
quite wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.6)
display isn't selfie friendly
video res low (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of external microphone support
28
pretty wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competitors (355 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f2.5)
screen isn't selfie friendly
low res video (640 x 480 pxls)
no mic port
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-Z400 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
 Casio Exilim EX-Z400Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
General Information
Manufacturer Casio Ricoh
Model Casio Exilim EX-Z400 Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
Class Ultracompact Advanced Mirrorless
Launched 2009-01-08 2010-03-18
Body design Ultracompact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor - Smooth Imaging Engine IV
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/1.7"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 4000 x 3000 3648 x 2736
Max native ISO 1600 3200
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 28-112mm (4.0x) 24-72mm (3.0x)
Max aperture f/2.6-7.0 f/2.5-4.4
Macro focus distance - 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 4.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3" 3"
Screen resolution 230k dot 920k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic (optional)
Features
Minimum shutter speed 1/2 seconds 180 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/1000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed - 2.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range - 4.50 m
Flash modes - Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 640x480
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB none USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 130g (0.29 lb) 355g (0.78 lb)
Dimensions 95 x 60 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 410 photos
Type of battery - Battery Pack
Battery model NP-40 -
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) )
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Pricing at release $0 $349