Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh WG-30
95 Imaging
34 Features
25 Overall
30
91 Imaging
40 Features
34 Overall
37
Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh WG-30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F2.6-7.0) lens
- 130g - 95 x 60 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 192g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Announced October 2014
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh WG-30 Overview
Here, we will be contrasting the Casio EX-Z400 and Ricoh WG-30, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Casio and Ricoh. There is a large difference between the resolutions of the EX-Z400 (12MP) and WG-30 (16MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-Z400 was manufactured 6 years earlier than the WG-30 and that is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-Z400 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh WG-30 being a Compact camera.
Before going right into a in-depth comparison, here is a simple view of how the EX-Z400 scores versus the WG-30 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh WG-30 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-Z400 & Ricoh WG-30. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z400 Gallery & Ricoh WG-30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z400 over the Ricoh WG-30
| EX-Z400 | WG-30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30 over the Casio EX-Z400
| WG-30 | EX-Z400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | October 2014 | January 2009 | More recent by 70 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z400 and Ricoh WG-30
| EX-Z400 | WG-30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Lack of manual focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Same screen resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Neither features Touch screen |
Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh WG-30 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to lug around your camera frequently, you should take into account its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-Z400 enjoys exterior dimensions of 95mm x 60mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 130 grams (0.29 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-30 has measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-Z400 and Ricoh WG-30 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Here is a front view over all size comparison of the EX-Z400 vs the WG-30.

Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z400 and WG-30 is 95 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh WG-30 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very hard to envision the gap between sensor measurements only by reviewing specifications. The graphic underneath will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z400 and WG-30.
Plainly, both the cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same resolution. You can expect the Ricoh WG-30 to deliver more detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures way more aggressively. The older EX-Z400 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh WG-30 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh WG-30 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z400 | Ricoh WG-30 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z400 | Ricoh WG-30 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2009-01-08 | 2014-10-09 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.6-7.0 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 1/2 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 1.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 3.90 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 130 gr (0.29 pounds) | 192 gr (0.42 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 95 x 60 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 photos |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-40 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail pricing | $0 | $428 |