Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh WG-30
95 Imaging
34 Features
25 Overall
30
91 Imaging
40 Features
34 Overall
37
Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh WG-30 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F2.6-7.0) lens
- 130g - 95 x 60 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 192g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Announced October 2014
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh WG-30 Overview
Here, we will be contrasting the Casio EX-Z400 and Ricoh WG-30, former being a Ultracompact while the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Casio and Ricoh. There is a large difference between the resolutions of the EX-Z400 (12MP) and WG-30 (16MP) but both cameras boast the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-Z400 was manufactured 6 years earlier than the WG-30 and that is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-Z400 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh WG-30 being a Compact camera.
Before going right into a in-depth comparison, here is a simple view of how the EX-Z400 scores versus the WG-30 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh WG-30 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-Z400 & Ricoh WG-30. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z400 Gallery & Ricoh WG-30 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z400 over the Ricoh WG-30
| EX-Z400 | WG-30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30 over the Casio EX-Z400
| WG-30 | EX-Z400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | October 2014 |  | January 2009 | More recent by 70 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z400 and Ricoh WG-30
| EX-Z400 | WG-30 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither features Touch screen |
Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh WG-30 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to lug around your camera frequently, you should take into account its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-Z400 enjoys exterior dimensions of 95mm x 60mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 130 grams (0.29 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-30 has measurements of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 192 grams (0.42 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-Z400 and Ricoh WG-30 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Here is a front view over all size comparison of the EX-Z400 vs the WG-30.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z400 and WG-30 is 95 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh WG-30 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very hard to envision the gap between sensor measurements only by reviewing specifications. The graphic underneath will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z400 and WG-30.
Plainly, both the cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same resolution. You can expect the Ricoh WG-30 to deliver more detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures way more aggressively. The older EX-Z400 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh WG-30 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh WG-30 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z400 | Ricoh WG-30 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z400 | Ricoh WG-30 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2009-01-08 | 2014-10-09 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.6-7.0 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 1/2 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 1.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 3.90 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 130 gr (0.29 pounds) | 192 gr (0.42 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 95 x 60 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 photos |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-40 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail pricing | $0 | $428 |