Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh WG-30W
95 Imaging
34 Features
25 Overall
30
91 Imaging
40 Features
34 Overall
37
Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh WG-30W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F2.6-7.0) lens
- 130g - 95 x 60 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 194g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Revealed October 2014
Photography Glossary Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh WG-30W Overview
Lets take a closer look at the Casio EX-Z400 versus Ricoh WG-30W, one being a Ultracompact and the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Casio and Ricoh. There is a significant difference between the resolutions of the EX-Z400 (12MP) and WG-30W (16MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-Z400 was manufactured 6 years earlier than the WG-30W and that is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z400 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh WG-30W being a Compact camera.
Before going into a more detailed comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the EX-Z400 matches up vs the WG-30W with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh WG-30W Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-Z400 and Ricoh WG-30W. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z400 Gallery and Ricoh WG-30W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z400 over the Ricoh WG-30W
| EX-Z400 | WG-30W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-30W over the Casio EX-Z400
| WG-30W | EX-Z400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | October 2014 | January 2009 | More recent by 70 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z400 and Ricoh WG-30W
| EX-Z400 | WG-30W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | No manual focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display resolution | 230k | 230k | Equal display resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Neither has Touch display |
Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh WG-30W Physical Comparison
If you are planning to lug around your camera regularly, you will want to factor in its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z400 has physical measurements of 95mm x 60mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 130 grams (0.29 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-30W has sizing of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
See the Casio EX-Z400 versus Ricoh WG-30W in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilising during that time. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the EX-Z400 versus the WG-30W.

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z400 and WG-30W is 95 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh WG-30W Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be difficult to imagine the gap between sensor measurements just by reading through specifications. The photograph here might offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z400 and WG-30W.
Plainly, both the cameras have the same sensor dimensions but different megapixels. You should anticipate the Ricoh WG-30W to give greater detail due to its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images a bit more aggressively. The older EX-Z400 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh WG-30W Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh WG-30W Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z400 | Ricoh WG-30W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z400 | Ricoh WG-30W |
| Type | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2009-01-08 | 2014-10-09 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.6-7.0 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 1/2 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 1.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 3.90 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 130 gr (0.29 pounds) | 194 gr (0.43 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 95 x 60 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 shots |
| Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-40 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $0 | $280 |