Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh WG-50
95 Imaging
34 Features
25 Overall
30
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh WG-50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F2.6-7.0) lens
- 130g - 95 x 60 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Launched May 2017
Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh WG-50 Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Casio EX-Z400 versus Ricoh WG-50, one is a Ultracompact and the latter is a Waterproof by brands Casio and Ricoh. There is a huge difference between the sensor resolutions of the EX-Z400 (12MP) and WG-50 (16MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-Z400 was revealed 9 years earlier than the WG-50 which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z400 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh WG-50 being a Compact camera.
Before we go into a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the EX-Z400 scores vs the WG-50 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh WG-50 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-Z400 and Ricoh WG-50. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-Z400 Gallery and Ricoh WG-50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z400 over the Ricoh WG-50
EX-Z400 | WG-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Casio EX-Z400
WG-50 | EX-Z400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | May 2017 | January 2009 | Newer by 101 months | |
Focus manually | Very precise focus |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z400 and Ricoh WG-50
EX-Z400 | WG-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Exact same screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither has Touch screen |
Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh WG-50 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to travel with your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-Z400 has external dimensions of 95mm x 60mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 130 grams (0.29 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-50 has proportions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-Z400 versus Ricoh WG-50 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the EX-Z400 against the WG-50.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z400 and WG-50 is 95 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh WG-50 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's hard to envision the difference between sensor dimensions merely by checking technical specs. The image underneath may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z400 and WG-50.
As you can tell, both cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You should expect the Ricoh WG-50 to give you more detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z400 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh WG-50 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh WG-50 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z400 | Ricoh WG-50 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Ricoh |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z400 | Ricoh WG-50 |
Type | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2009-01-08 | 2017-05-24 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.6-7.0 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Display resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 1/2s | 4s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/1000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 8.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | - | On, off |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Yes (Wireless) |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 130 gr (0.29 lb) | 193 gr (0.43 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 95 x 60 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 pictures |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-40 | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $0 | $280 |