Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh WG-50
95 Imaging
34 Features
25 Overall
30


91 Imaging
41 Features
39 Overall
40
Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh WG-50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F2.6-7.0) lens
- 130g - 95 x 60 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Launched May 2017

Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh WG-50 Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Casio EX-Z400 versus Ricoh WG-50, one is a Ultracompact and the latter is a Waterproof by brands Casio and Ricoh. There is a huge difference between the sensor resolutions of the EX-Z400 (12MP) and WG-50 (16MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").

The EX-Z400 was revealed 9 years earlier than the WG-50 which is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z400 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh WG-50 being a Compact camera.
Before we go into a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the EX-Z400 scores vs the WG-50 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh WG-50 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-Z400 and Ricoh WG-50. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-Z400 Gallery and Ricoh WG-50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z400 over the Ricoh WG-50
EX-Z400 | WG-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Casio EX-Z400
WG-50 | EX-Z400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | May 2017 | ![]() | January 2009 | Newer by 101 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Very precise focus |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z400 and Ricoh WG-50
EX-Z400 | WG-50 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Exact same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither has Touch screen |
Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh WG-50 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to travel with your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-Z400 has external dimensions of 95mm x 60mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 130 grams (0.29 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-50 has proportions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-Z400 versus Ricoh WG-50 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the EX-Z400 against the WG-50.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z400 and WG-50 is 95 and 91 respectively.

Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh WG-50 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's hard to envision the difference between sensor dimensions merely by checking technical specs. The image underneath may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z400 and WG-50.
As you can tell, both cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You should expect the Ricoh WG-50 to give you more detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z400 is going to be behind in sensor innovation.

Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh WG-50 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh WG-50 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z400 | Ricoh WG-50 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Ricoh |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z400 | Ricoh WG-50 |
Type | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2009-01-08 | 2017-05-24 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.6-7.0 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Display resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 1/2s | 4s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/1000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 8.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | - | On, off |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Yes (Wireless) |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 130 gr (0.29 lb) | 193 gr (0.43 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 95 x 60 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 pictures |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-40 | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $0 | $280 |