Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh WG-70
95 Imaging
34 Features
25 Overall
30
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh WG-70 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F2.6-7.0) lens
- 130g - 95 x 60 x 23mm
- Released January 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Revealed February 2020
- Replacement is Ricoh WG-80
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh WG-70 Overview
Here, we will be looking at the Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh WG-70, one is a Ultracompact and the latter is a Waterproof by companies Casio and Ricoh. There is a big difference between the image resolutions of the EX-Z400 (12MP) and WG-70 (16MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe EX-Z400 was released 12 years before the WG-70 which is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-Z400 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh WG-70 being a Compact camera.
Before going right into a detailed comparison, here is a quick summation of how the EX-Z400 matches up against the WG-70 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh WG-70 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-Z400 and Ricoh WG-70. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z400 Gallery and Ricoh WG-70 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z400 over the Ricoh WG-70
| EX-Z400 | WG-70 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-70 over the Casio EX-Z400
| WG-70 | EX-Z400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2020 |  | January 2009 | Newer by 134 months |
| Manual focus |  | Dial precise focusing |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z400 and Ricoh WG-70
| EX-Z400 | WG-70 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh WG-70 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to travel with your camera often, you're going to have to factor its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z400 has outer measurements of 95mm x 60mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 130 grams (0.29 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-70 has sizing of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh WG-70 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are working with at that moment. The following is a front view measurements comparison of the EX-Z400 vs the WG-70.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z400 and WG-70 is 95 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh WG-70 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is tough to visualise the gap between sensor dimensions merely by reviewing a spec sheet. The picture here might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z400 and WG-70.
Clearly, both cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same megapixels. You should expect the Ricoh WG-70 to offer you greater detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z400 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh WG-70 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh WG-70 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z400 | Ricoh WG-70 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z400 | Ricoh WG-70 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2009-01-08 | 2020-02-04 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.6-7.0 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 1/2s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1000s | 1/4000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | - | On, off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Yes (Wireless) |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 130 gr (0.29 pounds) | 193 gr (0.43 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 95 x 60 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 pictures |
| Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-40 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $0 | $280 |