Casio EX-Z400 vs Samsung EX2F
95 Imaging
34 Features
25 Overall
30
90 Imaging
36 Features
62 Overall
46
Casio EX-Z400 vs Samsung EX2F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F2.6-7.0) lens
- 130g - 95 x 60 x 23mm
- Revealed January 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-80mm (F1.4-2.7) lens
- 294g - 112 x 62 x 29mm
- Announced December 2012
Photography Glossary Casio EX-Z400 vs Samsung EX2F: A Hands-On Comparison for Photography Enthusiasts
Choosing the right camera for your creative vision is always a balancing act. Today, we’re diving deep into two distinct compact cameras from the earlier digital age - the 2009 Casio EX-Z400 Ultracompact and the 2012 Samsung EX2F Small Sensor Compact. Both cameras offer unique strengths and limitations shaped by their design philosophies and target users. As photographers who have tested thousands of cameras, we’ll dissect these models from every angle - from sensor technology and optics to ergonomics, real-world shooting, and how they stack up across photography genres.
Whether you’re searching for a budget-friendly travel companion or planning to shoot portraits, landscapes, or video, this detailed analysis will help you understand what each camera brings to the table and which might best fit your needs.
What’s in Your Hands? Size and Ergonomics Matter
The physical feel of a camera often sets the tone for your entire shooting experience.
Casio EX-Z400: This is a true Ultracompact, designed for absolute portability. Measuring a svelte 95x60x23 mm and weighing just 130 grams, it slips comfortably into any pocket or purse. Its unassuming footprint is great for street photography or travel when you want to travel light and stay discreet.
Samsung EX2F: At 112x62x29 mm and 294 grams, the EX2F is more substantial - a compact rather than an ultracompact. This added heft and size allow for better grip and more substantial controls.

You can see here the practical trade-off: the EX-Z400 wins for absolute portability, but the EX2F’s larger body offers more ergonomic handling, especially for prolonged use.
A Closer Look Down the Barrel: Lens and Zoom Capabilities
Optics define not only what you can see but how creatively you can express your vision.
| Feature | Casio EX-Z400 | Samsung EX2F |
|---|---|---|
| Lens Type | Fixed, 28-112 mm (4x zoom) | Fixed, 24-80 mm (3.3x zoom) |
| Max Aperture | f/2.6 - f/7.0 | f/1.4 - f/2.7 |
| Focal Length Multiplier | 5.8x | 4.8x |
| Macro Focus | Not specified | Not specified |
| Image Stabilization | Sensor-shift | Optical |
The EX-Z400 offers a 28-112 mm equivalent range, providing a decent zoom, but its lens is relatively slow at the telephoto end (f/7.0 max aperture). This limits low-light performance and depth-of-field control.
Conversely, the Samsung EX2F starts wider at 24mm (good for landscapes and interiors) and has the advantage of a very bright f/1.4 aperture at the wide end - remarkable for a compact camera. This lens makes it very capable in low light and offers much more control over background blur (bokeh). The optical image stabilization on the EX2F complements this, allowing you to handhold longer exposures without blur.
In practical terms, if your photography often finds you shooting indoors, portraits, or nighttime cityscapes, the EX2F’s faster lens is a huge plus.
Sensors in Focus: The Heart of Image Quality
Much of image quality depends on the sensor size and technology inside the camera.
| Specification | Casio EX-Z400 | Samsung EX2F |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor Type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor Size (inches) | 1/2.3" (6.17 x 4.55 mm) | 1/1.7" (7.44 x 5.58 mm) |
| Sensor Area (mm²) | 28.07 | 41.52 |
| Resolution | 12 MP | 12 MP |
| Max ISO (native) | 1600 | 3200 |
| RAW Support | No | Yes |

Here’s where the EX2F pulls ahead significantly. Its larger 1/1.7" BSI-CMOS sensor not only physically gathers more light than the EX-Z400’s smaller CCD sensor but also leverages back-illuminated technology for improved sensitivity and noise-reduction in dim environments. This results in cleaner images at higher ISO values - a crucial factor if you shoot events, indoors, or at night.
The lack of RAW support on the Casio means you’re stuck with JPEG compression and less flexibility during post-processing. Professionals or enthusiasts who want to fine-tune their images after capture will find this limiting.
User Interface and Controls: How You Interact Matters
The best camera is only as good as how intuitively you can use it.
The Casio EX-Z400 offers a fixed 3-inch LCD screen with a modest 230k-dot resolution. It lacks touchscreen capability and electronic viewfinder options. Its simple control layout reflects a point-and-shoot philosophy, with no manual exposure modes or customizable buttons.
Samsung’s EX2F gives you a 3-inch fully articulated AMOLED display. AMOLED technology means vibrant colors and high contrast, great in bright daylight. The swivel feature allows shooting from tough angles or selfies, which adds versatility. While no touchscreen is present, the EX2F supports full manual exposure modes, including shutter and aperture priority, appealing to more technically minded users.

In use, the EX-Z400 feels straightforward and beginner-friendly but limited. The EX2F empowers you with more creative control, aligning better with evolving photographic skills.
Handling and Ergonomics: The Feel of the Camera in Your Hands
Control placement and tactile feedback affect your shooting speed and comfort.

Notice the Samsung’s dedicated dials and buttons for exposure adjustments and ISO, alongside a well-placed mode dial. This layout promotes quicker setting changes during dynamic shoots, such as street or event photography.
The Casio’s minimalist control scheme is excellent for simple snapshots but less efficient for serious photographers who want quick access to settings.
Real-World Image Performance: Samples and Comparisons
Let’s look at what these cameras deliver out in the field.
- Portraits: The EX2F’s bright lens creates smoother, more pleasing bokeh, isolating subjects effectively. Skin tones render naturally thanks to its wider dynamic range.
- Landscapes: The higher dynamic range and better noise control on the EX2F preserve details in shadows and highlights.
- Low Light: The EX2F shoots clean images up to ISO 1600 and beyond, whereas the EX-Z400 introduces noticeable noise past ISO 400.
- Video: The EX2F records Full HD at 1920x1080, whereas the EX-Z400 caps at 720p. The EX2F’s video is sharper, richer, and more usable for casual vlogging.
Which Camera Excels in Each Photography Genre?
Here’s an authoritative evaluation using practical performance criteria across genres:
| Photography Type | Casio EX-Z400 | Samsung EX2F |
|---|---|---|
| Portrait | Limited aperture range, basic AF | Bright lens, wider aperture, manual control |
| Landscape | Basic dynamic range, small sensor | Better dynamic range, larger sensor |
| Wildlife | Slow AF, limited zoom | Faster AF, stabilizer, but limited zoom |
| Sports | No fast continuous burst, slow shutter | Moderate shutter control, no burst mode |
| Street | Ultra compact size aids discretion | Compact but larger, better handling |
| Macro | No dedicated macro mode | Good close focusing, sharper lens |
| Night/Astro | High noise, ISO limit 1600 | Cleaner high ISO performance up to 3200 |
| Video | 720p MJPEG, no mic input | 1080p H.264, no mic input |
| Travel | Ultra portable, lightweight | More versatile with articulating screen |
| Professional Work | No RAW, limited control | RAW support, manual modes, advanced controls |
Durability, Battery, and Storage: Practical Considerations
Neither camera offers weather sealing or rugged protections. The EX2F weighs more than double the EX-Z400, but that comes with ergonomic and feature benefits.
Battery life data is sparse, but the EX-Z400 uses a compact NP-40 battery, lightweight but modest capacity, while the EX2F uses a rechargeable SLB-10A battery, designed for longer shooting sessions.
Both use SD cards, with the EX2F supporting SDXC for higher capacity memory cards.
Connectivity and Workflow Integration
The EX-Z400 does not offer wireless or USB connections (needs card reader for transfers), limiting quick sharing and tethering options. The EX2F integrates built-in wireless connectivity (Wi-Fi), allowing easier image transfer to smartphones or computers - an advantage if you create content on the go.
Both support HDMI output for viewing images or video on external displays. The EX2F has a USB 2.0 port, making it easier to tether or offload files without the hassle.
A Technical Deep Dive: Autofocus and Exposure Control
Both cameras rely on contrast-detection autofocus.
- Casio EX-Z400: Single autofocus mode only; relatively slow and lacks face or eye detection. This can hinder portrait sharpness.
- Samsung EX2F: Also uses contrast detect, with no dedicated face detection but faster focusing speed. Manual focus is available, giving greater control.
Exposure modes underline the EX2F’s superiority:
- EX-Z400 offers only automatic exposure and no manual aperture/shutter priority.
- EX2F supports shutter priority, aperture priority, and full manual mode, offering artistic control over motion blur and depth of field.
Price-to-Performance: Balancing Budget and Features
At launch, the Casio EX-Z400 was positioned as a budget ultracompact, often found at low used prices nowadays. Despite its limitations, it’s a lightweight, pocket-ready shooter for casual users.
The Samsung EX2F commanded a premium price (around $478), reflecting its advanced optics, larger sensor, and more versatile features. For photographers who value image quality, control, and video, this corresponds to better value.
Final Thoughts: Which Camera Should You Choose?
| User Profile | Best Choice | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Casual traveler/Street shooter | Casio EX-Z400 | Ultra portable, simple operation, lightweight |
| Enthusiast seeking quality | Samsung EX2F | Larger sensor, fast lens, manual controls |
| Portrait and low light user | Samsung EX2F | Bright f/1.4 aperture, better noise handling |
| Video content creator | Samsung EX2F | Full HD video, articulating screen |
| Budget-limited buyer | Casio EX-Z400 | Affordable, basic feature set |
If you are just getting started and want a straightforward, razor-thin camera to capture memories without fuss, the EX-Z400 serves well. But if you desire a compact powerhouse that lets you hone your skills, shoot versatile photos and videos, and enjoy creative freedom - even with some trade-off in size and weight - the Samsung EX2F remains a compelling choice.
Explore Further and Get Hands-On
Remember, no spec sheet replaces hands-on experience. If possible, check out these cameras in-store or through rentals to feel how each matches your style and workflow. Consider pairing your camera with compatible accessories - extra batteries, SD cards, or even a small tripod - to enhance your shooting.
Your creative journey deserves a camera that feels like an extension of your vision. Whether that’s the nimble Casio EX-Z400 or the more technically adept Samsung EX2F, knowing their strengths helps you choose a partner for countless photographic adventures ahead.
Happy shooting, and may your images inspire!
Casio EX-Z400 vs Samsung EX2F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z400 | Samsung EX2F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z400 | Samsung EX2F |
| Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2009-01-08 | 2012-12-18 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 24-80mm (3.3x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.6-7.0 | f/1.4-2.7 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 0 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | - | AMOLED |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 1/2 secs | - |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1000 secs | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 130 grams (0.29 pounds) | 294 grams (0.65 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 95 x 60 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 112 x 62 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 48 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 20.0 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.5 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 209 |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-40 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $0 | $478 |