Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus TG-320
Portability
95 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
95 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
Portability
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus TG-320 Key Specs
Olympus FE-5020
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-120mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 137g - 93 x 56 x 25mm
- Revealed July 2009
- Additionally Known as X-935
Olympus TG-320
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Released January 2012
Photography Glossary Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus TG-320 Overview
Its time to look more in depth at the Olympus FE-5020 versus Olympus TG-320, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof and both of them are offered by Olympus. The resolution of the FE-5020 (12MP) and the TG-320 (14MP) is pretty comparable and both cameras have the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe FE-5020 was revealed 3 years earlier than the TG-320 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before diving into a full comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the FE-5020 grades vs the TG-320 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus TG-320 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus FE-5020 and Olympus TG-320. The full galleries are available at Olympus FE-5020 Gallery and Olympus TG-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5020 over the Olympus TG-320
| FE-5020 | TG-320 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Olympus FE-5020
| TG-320 | FE-5020 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2012 |  | July 2009 | More modern by 30 months |
Common features in the Olympus FE-5020 and Olympus TG-320
| FE-5020 | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 2.7" |  | 2.7" | Same screen sizing |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Identical screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus TG-320 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry around your camera often, you will want to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus FE-5020 features exterior measurements of 93mm x 56mm x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") having a weight of 137 grams (0.30 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-320 has dimensions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus FE-5020 versus Olympus TG-320 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilising at that time. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the FE-5020 versus the TG-320.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the FE-5020 and TG-320 is 95 and 94 respectively.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus TG-320 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be hard to imagine the contrast in sensor sizes only by going through specs. The picture below will offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the FE-5020 and TG-320.
All in all, both the cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different megapixels. You should expect the Olympus TG-320 to show greater detail because of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The more aged FE-5020 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus FE-5020 as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus TG-320 as a Portrait photography camera
focusing manually not possible
no manual control
no external flash support
low megapixels (12MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
good MP (14 megapixels)
comes with face detection focusing
manual focus not available
manual mode not available
external flash not possible
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Olympus FE-5020 as a Street photography camera
Olympus TG-320 as a Street photography camera
environment sealing
lighter than competition (137 grams)
no moving screen
does not have image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather sealing
lighter than competitors (155 grams)
no moving screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Sports photography with Olympus FE-5020
Sports photography with Olympus TG-320
environment sealing
low maximum shutter speed (1/500s)
lack of shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
low megapixels (12MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (14MP)
comes with tracking autofocus
weather sealing
slow frames per second (1.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
terrible battery life (150 per charge)
no phase detect AF
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Travel photography with Olympus FE-5020
Travel photography with Olympus TG-320
lighter than competition (137 grams)
environment sealing
flash built-in
decently wide (24mm)
does not have Timelapse function
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
lighter than competitors (155 grams)
weather sealing
good MP (14MP)
flash built-in
decently wide (28mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
terrible battery life (150 CIPA)
display is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Olympus FE-5020 Landscape photography highlights
Olympus TG-320 Landscape photography highlights
decently wide (24mm)
environment sealing
focusing manually not possible
cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
small screen (2.7 inch)
no manual control
does not have image stabilization
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
does not have Timelapse function
decently wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (14 megapixels)
weather sealing
manual focus not available
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
tiny screen (2.7 inch)
manual mode not available
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
terrible battery life (150 CIPA)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Olympus FE-5020
Vlogging with Olympus TG-320
decently wide (24mm)
lighter than competition (137 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.3)
display isn't selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
low video resolution (640 x 480 resolution)
does not have microphone port
decently wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detection focusing
lighter than competitors (155 grams)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
display is not selfie friendly
low quality video (1280 x 720 pxls)
doesn't have external mic socket
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus FE-5020 vs Olympus TG-320 Specifications
| Olympus FE-5020 | Olympus TG-320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus FE-5020 | Olympus TG-320 |
| Also Known as | X-935 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2009-07-22 | 2012-01-10 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
| Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.3-5.8 | f/3.5-5.1 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 2.7 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Display resolution | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/500 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 1.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.10 m | 5.80 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 137 grams (0.30 pounds) | 155 grams (0.34 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 93 x 56 x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 150 images |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-42B | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (12 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | xD-Picture Card, microSD | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $160 | $0 |